A treatise of the cohabitacyon of the faithfull with the vnfaithfull.: Whereunto is added. A sermon made of the confessing of Christe and his gospell, and of the denyinge of the same.Vermigli, Pietro Martire
Religion
A treatise of the cohabitacyon of the faithfull with the vnfaithfull.: Whereunto is added. A sermon made of the confessing of Christe and his gospell, and of the denyinge of the same.
Vermigli, Pietro Martire
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800
I will not now reason how that the Masse doth agre nothing at
all with the lordes supper / for this is euẽ to the eyes of all
men often tymes shewed in many bookes of most lerned and godly
seruantes of Godd. Yea euẽ children which are but instructed in
the prĩciples of faith / do know that Christe did institute a
comõ partaking / ore communiõ / in which all the faithfull which
are one bodie in Christe are knitt together into one bodie / ãd
that the Masse is a dissipaciõ of vnitie and a priuate deuowrĩg
of one lurching sacrificer. They knowe that Christ cõmaũded:
Take / eate / diuide it amonge you / and drincke ye all of this.
And that the Masse doth sett furth theis thinges to be gazed
vppon / to be worshipped / to be caried about / and to be shutt
vpp / to be hãdeled and also receyued of preistes only: They
know that Christe sayd: Do this in the rememberaunce of me. And
that the priestes do saye Masse in the remẽberaunce of sayntes /
that they do sacrifice for the synnes of the quicke and the
deade / and to be short that they do say masse for euery
thinge / for filthie lucres sake.
Ther were in the tyme of the Apostles certayn witty disputars
which reasoned that it was lawful for Christians to eate meates
offered vnto Idols. Meates offered to Idolls / were sacrifices
vsed in the temples of Idolls / to be offered vnto Idols.
Therfor thos faithfull men did contend / that it was lauful
indifferently to communicate with the holy seruice of the
Christians / and also to sytte down in the Idols feaste. They
did add plausible expositiõs / that an Idoll was nothinge /
bycause Godd was not represented by the Idoll / that ther is but
one Godd / the same our true and euerlastinge Godd: Wherof it
folowed that the Idoll was nothinge / that is to say a thinge of
no valure or a very vanitie / that it could hurt no bodie / and
that the very meate offered vnto the Idoll was a thinge of
nothinge / that it did defile no man. But Paule with many wordes
doth confute that folery. 1. Cor. cap. 8. 9. and 10. In this
tenth chapter amonge other thinges he gatherith of the nature of
the supper of the lord that a man maye not bothe be partaker of
the supper of the lorde and of the table of Idols / and saith:
Ye cã not drincke of the cup of the lorde / and of the cup of
deuils. Ye can not be partakers of the lordes table / and of the
table of deuiles. Either do we prouoke the lorde? Are we strõger
then he? Also the Apostles of Christe and elders of the churche
of Hierusalem in that same greate and notable coũcell of
Hierusalem / which of all that euer were was most holy and of
most auctoritie / did playnly forbidd the Gentils / which were
conuerted to Christe / thos meates offered to Idols. Yea and the
lord Iesus hymself in the boke of the Reuelacion doth greuusly
accuse and condemne them which do eate meate offered vnto Idols.
This may ye se in the epistles of the churche of Pergamos and
Thiatira.
[[Apocal. 2.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account