A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
NOW though no one can be more intimately convinced than I am, that
Nature, acting for ever upon surer principles than Art, possesses
resources which she often displays in the most desperate exigencies; I
own, that in this case I am not for totally relying upon her
beneficence[32]. Here is a wrong to redress, not owing to her, but to
deficient practice; and this wrong can hardly be repaired by her alone,
unless something of a better practice contributes to relieve her. That
practice is not, however, the less recommendable for being plain and
obvious. The most gentle, the most guarded, but withal the most
efficacious means must be tried, little by little, to insinuate the
fingers and hand into the uterus, how closely contracted soever it may
be; for yield it will; and then seize the head by the mouth, the
occipital cavity, or whatever other part affords the least slippery
hold, without waiting whole hours, as do certain ignorant or negligent
practitioners with respect to the after-birth, who give time to the
uterus to enter into too strong contraction.
SOME authors, and other persons of much that depth of practical merit,
having learned solely by the experience of delaying to bring away the
after-birth, that, to abandon thus the head of a child remaining in the
uterus, was, at the same time, to expose the mother to the highest
danger, judged it expedient to have recourse to auxiliary methods. They
have therefore employed and directed for this purpose such edge-tools,
as instruments and crotchets of different figures, some to incide and
separate the bones of the skull; others to bring them away piece-meal,
or all together, according as they should find the operation the
easiest. [33] DYONIS and Mauriceau are of opinion, that the crotchet
should be thrust into the most convenient place of the head, such as the
mouth, one of the orbits of the eye, or the occipital cavity; after
which, you are to endeavour to bring away the head by redoubled efforts.
But if the crotchet slips, as the head is of a round figure, and may
turn like a ball, they direct you to thrust the crotchet into the hole
of the ear, then giving some one the handle to hold, you are to strike
another crotchet of the same figure in the other ear, and so pulling
with both crotchets at once, extract the head, that is to say, if
possible.
AY, that “_if possible_,” is well added; for with infinite submission to
those very _learned_ gentlemen, nothing appears to me more
impracticable; and, I fancy, if they had ever made the experiment, they
would have found it so. What a blind operation, with such instruments,
and in such a place!
GUILLEMEAU (Treat. of Mid. Book II. chap. 17.) remarks, that, in such
case, you should take the time that the woman has a labor-pain to
accomplish the extraction by this method, that is to say, to snatch that
moment to extract the head, when you BELIEVE you have got fast hold of
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account