A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a MidwifeNihell, Elizabeth
History
A Treatise on the Art of Midwifery: Setting Forth Various Abuses Therein, Especially as to the Practice With Instruments: the Whole Serving to Put All Rational Inquirers in a Fair Way of Very Safely Forming Their Own Judgement Upon the Question; Which It Is Best to Employ, in Cases of Pregnancy and Lying-in, a Man-midwife; Or, a Midwife
Nihell, Elizabeth
Midwifery -- Early works to 1800; Obstetrics -- Early works to 1800
BUT if the woman is too badly conformed, Dyonis (Book II. page 287)
advises the use of the edged crotchets to cut the head to pieces, and
bring away, by parts, what you could not do whole.
MAURICEAU (Book II. page 287) would have it so, that this sort of
crooked knife should have a long handle; and says, that Ambrose Paræus
and Guillemeau are for a short one to it. Doctors will disagree. They
all however give their respective reasons, and it is indeed hard to say
which does not give the worst.
MR. De la Motte, in the like circumstances, made use of a bistory, or
incision-knife inserted in a sheath, open at both ends; of which he
gives the following account. (Observ. 259.)
“I INTRODUCED, said he, into the uterus, my left hand, over which I
fixed the head; and with my right, I slipped in a sheath open at both
ends, in which was an incision-knife, that I applied to this head, and
made an opening in it capable of admitting my fingers. I widened it
afterwards, as much as I thought proper, and scooped out a part of the
brain; after which, I got hold sufficient to bring away the head, of
which the volume was considerably diminished.”
AMBROSE PARÆUS (Book of Gener. chap. 33.) tells us he had, to his great
regret, a case of this sort fall to his share, the head of a fœtus
remaining in the uterus. To extricate himself from which, he proposes
much the same methods I have described after Dyonis and Mauriceau; and
advises, in the same case, that if they do not succeed, recourse should
be had to an instrument, called _pied de griffon_, (Griffin’s claw)
which he says he took from the French surgery of d’Alechamp. He gives
two forms of one, one of two branches, another of four. These
instruments, both the one and the other, are made on the principle of
the _Speculum Matricis_[34], of which the use is at once, so detestably
cruel, and so perfectly unavailing. The Griffin’s claw however differs
from the _speculum matricis_, in that the latter has its branches
elbowing in an angle, and that the former has its branches streight
a-top and at bottom, and arched in the middle, and furnished with
roughnesses to seize and keep hold of the head.
THOSE who will take the trouble to see the delineation of these
instruments, in these authors, will, at the very first glance of the
eye, be convinced of their unserviceableness. So would they be of that
of another instrument of the like nature, invented some years ago, and
attributed to a surgeon of Rouen, which is composed of two crotchets, of
which the blades are arched, and their extremities claw-footed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account