A Treatise on the Tactical Use of the Three Arms: Infantry, Artillery, and Cavalry — John Shaqi
A Treatise on the Tactical Use of the Three Arms: Infantry, Artillery, and CavalryLippitt, Francis J. (Francis James)
History
A Treatise on the Tactical Use of the Three Arms: Infantry, Artillery, and Cavalry
Lippitt, Francis J. (Francis James)
Tactics; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Campaigns
Tactical Use of Cavalry 93
I. ITS FORMATIONS 93
II. ITS STRONG AND ITS WEAK POINTS 98
III. HOW POSTED 99
IV. ITS SUPPORTS 104
V. HOW USED 106
VI. HOW IT FIGHTS 109
VII. ITS CHARGE 113
VIII. ITS ATTACK ON INFANTRY 122
A. GENERALLY 122
B. ON SQUARES 124
IX. GENERAL REMARKS 127
TACTICAL USE OF THE THREE ARMS.
Every complete military force consists of three arms,--INFANTRY,
ARTILLERY, and CAVALRY.
In battle, these three arms are united; and, other things being equal,
that commander will prove victorious who is best acquainted with their
combined use in the field.
In order thoroughly to understand the proper use of the three arms
combined, we must obviously begin by learning the proper use of each of
them separately.
Hence the importance of the subject of the present treatise. In
discussing it, we shall commence with the
TACTICAL USE OF INFANTRY.
The subject will be considered under the following heads:--
I.--ITS ATTACK, GENERALLY.
II.--FORMATIONS FOR ATTACK.
III.--THE ATTACK, HOW MADE.
IV.--BAYONET CHARGES.
V.--DEFENCE AGAINST INFANTRY.
VI.--DEFENCE AGAINST ARTILLERY.
VII.--DEFENCE AGAINST CAVALRY.
VIII.--SQUARES.
IX.--SKIRMISHERS.
I.--Its Attack, generally.
Infantry attacks with its fire, or with the bayonet. Which of these is
the more effective?
1. The _object_ of an attack is to destroy or capture the hostile force,
or, at least, to drive it from the field.
Capturing the enemy, or driving him from the field, cannot usually be
effected by merely firing upon him.
True, a mere fire at a distance may finally destroy him. But an
insuperable objection to this mode of attack is, that while we are
killing or disabling his men, he is killing or disabling as many of our
own.
2. If we fire from _behind cover_, our loss may be comparatively small.
But, in that case, the enemy will never remain for any length of time
exposed to our fire. He will either attack and rout us from our cover,
or retire. And even if he did neither, his actual and complete
destruction, capture, or rout, would still require an attack with the
bayonet.
3. It follows that the proper mode of attack by infantry on infantry is
with the _bayonet_.
The Russian Suwarrow's victories and reputation were won chiefly by his
fierce bayonet attacks, which often effected great results, in spite of
his ignorance of the art of war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account