"A 'dumb-bell nebula,' like those we find in the heavens," observed
Gazen. "Be that as it may, the rings would collect into balls, and some
of these, especially the outer, would cast off rings which would
condense into moons, always excepting the rings of Saturn, which, like
the planetoids, are evidently a failure. The solar system would then
appear as a group of suns, a cluster of stars, in short, a
constellation. Each would be what we call a 'nebulous star,' not unlike
the sun at present; that is to say, it would be surrounded by a glowing
atmosphere of vapours, and perhaps meteoric matter. Under the action of
gravity, centrifugal force, and tidal retardation, their orbits would
become more circular, they would gradually move further apart, rotate
more slowly on their axes, and assume the shapes they have now. In
cooling down, new chemical compounds, and probably elements would be
formed, since the so-called elements are perhaps mere combinations of a
primordial substance which have been produced at various temperatures.
The heavier elements, such as platinum, gold, and iron, would sink
towards the core; and the lighter, such as carbon, silicon, oxygen,
nitrogen, and hydrogen, would rise towards the surface. A crust would
form, and portions of it breaking in or bursting out together with
eruptions and floods of molten lava, would disturb the poise of the
planet, and give rise to inequalities of surface, to continents, and
mountains. When the crust was sufficiently stable, sound, and cool, the
mists and clouds would condense into rivers, lakes, or seas, and the
atmosphere would become clear. In due course life would make its
appearance."
"Can you account for that mystery?"
"No. Science is bound in honour, no doubt, to explain all it can without
calling in a special act of creation; but the origin of life and
intelligence seems to go beyond it, so far. Spontaneous generation from
dead matter is ruled out of court at present. We believe that life only
proceeds from life. As for the hypothesis that meteoric stones, the
'moss-grown fragments of another world' may have brought life to the
earth, I hardly know what to think of it."
"Has life ever been found on a meteoric stone?"
"Not that I know. Carbon, at all events in the state of graphite and
diamond, has been got from them. They arc generally a kind of slag,
containing nodules or crystals of iron, nickle, and other metals, and
look to me as if they had solidified from a liquid or vapour. Are they
ruins of an earlier cosmos--the crumbs of an exploded world--matter
ejected from the sun--the snow of a nebulous ring--frozen spray from the
fiery surge of a nebula? we cannot tell; but, according to the meteoric
as distinguished from the nebular hypothesis of the solar system, the
sun, planets, and comets, as well as the stars and nebula were all
generated by the clash of meteorites; and not as I have supposed, of
dead globes."
"Which hypothesis do you believe?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account