A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
There was much to say in extenuation, even for
‘duplicity of language’, when one remembers that the Jesuits alone (no
matter how mistaken their views of treatment may seem to modern eyes)
stood out against the assumption that the Indians were a mere flock of
sheep, who might be driven from their homes on any pretext, or at the
exigencies of ministers at courts who lived ten thousand miles away,
and were completely ignorant of the local circumstances. Whether the
memorial influenced the court of Spain is hard to say; but it is
certain that when, in 1752, the Marques de Valdelirios arrived in
Buenos Ayres, with him came as a commissioner to fix the boundary
between the two nations of the Uruguay Father Luis de Altamirano,
accompanied by his secretary, Rafael de Cordoba, both members of the
Order, and that the Marquis took up his lodging in the college of the
Jesuits. There papers and memorials rained on him: one came from the
Bishop of Tucuman, and one from Don Jaime de San Just, the Governor of
Paraguay, with many others from people of inferior note, all in the
interest of the Company. It appears as if Valdelirios thought that
these memorials were inspired, for his first action was to publish to
the priests of the seven towns the wishes of his government as to
evacuation by the Indians of the territory. This he did through the
prefect of the missions, who seems to have acted in good faith in his
endeavours to carry out the wishes of the Spanish court. Just at that
moment Barreda, the Provincial of Paraguay, arrived in Buenos Ayres,
and Valdelirios asked him his opinion as to the measures best
calculated to insure the treaty being quietly carried out. Barreda,
though all his interests were against the execution of the treaty,
seems to have acted in good faith. He gave the sensible advice that, as
the treaty had been made entirely without taking into consideration the
difficulties of carrying it out, it could not be held a crime to ask
the King for some delay.[268] He advised consulting three ex-Governors
of Paraguay, who happened to be in Buenos Ayres,[269] and, lastly, that
all hurry, or anything likely to excite the Indians, should be avoided;
for it was possible that they, relying on their numbers and local
knowledge, might be able to give much trouble even to the joint forces
of both crowns. He laid before Valdelirios the condition of the
reductions, telling him that they were fertile and well
cultivated,[270] and that this of itself would incline the Indians
against migrating from their lands. Lastly, he said it was the opinion
of the most experienced of the priests that the Indians would yield
neither to arguments nor reason, for the hatred of the Portuguese had
put them quite beside themselves with fury at the idea of giving up
their lands. Valdelirios must have found himself not in too comfortable
a state. Lodged as he was in the college of the Jesuits, he must have
felt that most of the advice which was so freely tendered him was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account