A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
History
A Vanished Arcadia: Being Some Account of the Jesuits in Paraguay 1607-1767
Cunninghame Graham, R. B. (Robert Bontine)
Jesuits -- Paraguay; Paraguay -- History -- To 1811
Jean de Lery, the well-known Huguenot pastor and friend of Calvin,
passed a year on the coast of Brazil about 1558, having accompanied the
expedition of the famous Villegagnau. In his book (‘Histoire d’un
Voyage faict en la Terre du Brezil’) he always refers to the Indians as
Toupinaubaoults, and has preserved many curious details of them before
they had had much contact with Europeans. He appears to have had a
considerable acquaintance with the language, and has left some curious
conversations _en langage sauvage et Français_, in which he gives some
grammatical rules. The language of conversation is almost identical
with that of Paraguay, though some words are used which are either
peculiar to the Tupis or obsolete in Paraguay to-day. His account of
their customs tallies with that of the various Spanish writers and
explorers who have written on the subject. Tobacco, which seems to have
been known under the name of ‘nicotiane’ to Lery, he finds in Brazil
under the name of ‘petun’, the same name by which it is called in
Paraguay at present. He believed that ‘petun’ and ‘nicotiane’ were two
different plants, but the only reason he adduces for his belief is that
‘nicotiane’ was brought in his time from Florida, which, as he
observes, is more than a thousand leagues from ‘Nostre Terre du
Brezil’. His experience of savages was the same as that of Azara, and
almost all early travellers, for he says: ‘Nos Toupinambaoults
reçoivent fort humainement les estrangers amis qui les vont
visiter.’[23] Lery, however, seemed to think that, in spite of their
pacific inclination, it was not prudent to put too much power in their
hands, for he remarks: ‘Au reste parcequ’ils chargeyent, et
remplisseyent leurs mousquets jusques au bout . . . nous leurs
baillions moitié (_i.e._, la poudre) de charbon broyé.’ This may have
been a wise precaution, but he omits to state if the _charbon broyé_
was _bailli_ at the same price as good powder. According to Azara, who
takes his facts partly from the contemporary writers—Schmidel, Alvar
Nuñez, Ruy Diaz de Guzman, and Barco de la Centenera—the Guaranís were
divided into numerous tribes, as Imbeguas, Caracaras, Tembues,
Colistines, and many others. These tribes, though apparently of a
common origin, never united, but each lived separately under its own
chief. Their towns were generally either close to or in the middle of
forests, or at the edge of rivers where there is wood. They all
cultivated pumpkins, beans, maize, mani (ground nuts), sweet potatoes,
and mandioca; but they lived largely by the chase, and ate much wild
honey. Diaz in his ‘Argentina’ (lib. i., chap. i.) makes them
cannibals. Azara believes this to have been untrue, as no traditions of
cannibalism were current amongst the Guaranís in his time, _i.e._, in
1789-1801. Liberal as Azara was, and careful observer of what he saw
himself, I am disposed to believe the testimony of so many
eye-witnesses of the customs of the primitive Guaranís, though none of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account