A View of Sir Isaac Newton's PhilosophyPemberton, Henry
Science
A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy
Pemberton, Henry
Newton, Isaac, 1642-1727. Principia
2. FOR the first it is proved by our author, that the colours of the
sun’s light are manifested by the prism, from the rays undergoing
different degrees of refraction; that the violet-making rays, which
go to the upper part of the coloured image in the first experiment
of the first chapter, are the most refracted; that the indigo-making
rays are refracted, or turned out of their course by passing through
the prism, something less than the violet-making rays, but more than
the blue-making rays; and the blue-making rays more than the green;
the green-making rays more than the yellow; the yellow more than the
orange; and the orange-making rays more than the red-making, which are
least of all refracted. The first proof of this, that rays of different
colours are refracted unequally is this. If you take any body, and
paint one half of it red and the other half blue, then upon viewing
it through a prism those two parts shall appear separated from each
other; which can be caused no otherwise than by the prism’s refracting
the light of one half more than the light of the other half. But the
blue half will be most refracted; for if the body be seen through the
prism in such a situation, that the body shall appear lifted upwards
by the refraction, as a body within a bason of water, in the experiment
mentioned in the first chapter, appeared to be lifted up by the
refraction of the water, so as to be seen at a greater distance than
when the bason is empty, then shall the blue part appear higher than
the red; but if the refraction of the prism be the contrary way, the
blue part shall be depressed more than the other. Again, after laying
fine threads of black silk across each of the colours, and the body
well inlightened, if the rays coming from it be received upon a convex
glass, so that it may by refracting the rays cast the image of the body
upon a piece of white paper held beyond the glass; then it will be seen
that the black threads upon the red part of the image, and those upon
the blue part, do not at the same time appear distinctly in the image
of the body projected by the glass; but if the paper be held so, that
the threads on the blue part may distinctly appear, the threads cannot
be seen distinct upon the red part; but the paper must be drawn farther
off from the convex glass to make the threads on this part visible; and
when the distance is great enough for the threads to be seen in this
red part, they become indistinct in the other. Whence it appears that
the rays proceeding from each point of the blue part of the body are
sooner united again by the convex glass than the rays which come from
each point of the red parts[311]. But both these experiments prove that
the blue-making rays, as well in the small refraction of the convex
glass, as in the greater refraction of the prism, are more bent, than
the red-making rays.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account