A View of Sir Isaac Newton's PhilosophyPemberton, Henry
Science
A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy
Pemberton, Henry
Newton, Isaac, 1642-1727. Principia
3. THIS seems already to explain the reason of the coloured spectrum
made by refracting the sun’s light with a prism, though our author
proceeds to examine that in particular, and proves that the different
coloured rays in that spectrum are in different degrees refracted; by
shewing how to place the prism in such a posture, that if all the rays
were refracted in the same manner, the spectrum should of necessity
be round: whereas in that case if the angle made by the two surfaces
of the prism, through which the light passes, that is the angle D F
E in fig. 126, be about 63 or 64 degrees, the image instead of being
round shall be near five times as long as broad; a difference enough
to shew a great inequality in the refractions of the rays, which
go to the opposite extremities of the image. To leave no scruple
unremoved, our author is very particular in shewing by a great number
of experiments, that this inequality of refraction is not casual, and
that it does not depend upon any irregularities of the glass; no nor
that the rays are in their passage through the prism each split and
divided; but on the contrary that every ray of the sun has its own
peculiar degree of refraction proper to it, according to which it is
more or less refracted in passing through pellucid substances always
in the same manner[312]. That the rays are not split and multiplied
by the refraction of the prism, the third of the experiments related
in our first chapter shews very clearly; for if they were, and the
length of the spectrum in the first refraction were thereby occasioned,
the breadth should be no less dilated by the cross refraction of the
second prism; whereas the breadth is not at all increased, but the
image is only thrown into an oblique posture by the upper part of the
rays which were at first more refracted than the under part, being
again turned farthest out of their course. But the experiment most
expressly adapted to prove this regular diversity of refraction is
this, which follows[313]. Two boards A B, C D (in fig. 130.) being
erected in a darkened room at a proper distance, one of them A B being
near the window-shutter E F, a space only being left for the prism G
H I to be placed between them; so that the rays entring at the hole M
of the window-shutter may after passing through the prism be trajected
through a smaller hole K made in the board A B, and passing on from
thence go out at another hole L made in the board C D of the same size
as the hole K, and small enough to transmit the rays of one colour
only at a time; let another prism N O P be placed after the board C
D to receive the rays passing through the holes K and L, and after
refraction by that prism let those rays fall upon the white surface
Q R. Suppose first the violet light to pass through the holes, and
to be refracted by the prism N O P to _s_, which if the prism N O P
were removed should have passed right onto W. If the prism G H I be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account