A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
In reply to the assertion made by French, and even by Prussian
official writers, “that Blücher and his troops saved the allied
army,” it may be observed, the battle of Waterloo must be always
considered as a battle fought by the right wing of an army, for the
purpose of maintaining a position until the arrival of the Prussians,
its left wing, should render victory certain. The safest tactics, in
the Duke’s opinion, were to act entirely on the defensive, and he
had, in consequence, thoroughly matured his arrangements with Blücher
for mutual support. The Duke, therefore, was not only justified
in receiving battle, but had every reason to expect to have been
reinforced several hours before the Prussians came up. Waterloo might
have terminated with much less sacrifice of life, and as decisively
at three, as it afterwards did at eight o’clock. But even admitting,
for a moment, that the arrival of the Prussians saved us at Waterloo,
we undoubtedly saved them by holding our position until they came up.
Had we given way before they cleared the defiles of St.-Lambert, they
would have been annihilated; of this they were aware, as our readers
will be convinced on reference to the letters from the Prussian to
the allied head-quarters[97].
But facts are stubborn things, and it is doubtful whether Napoleon
could have driven the British from the ground, even if the Prussians
had not arrived. The English troops had maintained their position
for eight hours against the most experienced army and the ablest
general ever France sent into the field; not a British regiment was
broken, nor the allied army in a panic, nor, at any time, in serious
danger of being penetrated. Further, even if the Prussians had not
arrived, we are inclined to think that Napoleon could not, in the
exhausted and dispirited condition of his troops, and the lateness of
the hour, have driven the British from their ground. His cavalry was
nearly annihilated: while three brigades of British infantry, one of
the King’s German legion, and two brigades of British cavalry[98],
had, except in the loss sustained by the 27th regiment, and 12th
dragoons, suffered but comparatively little; many of the foreign
troops had not fired a shot: and after the arrival of Vivian and
Vandeleur, the _British cavalry_ were, as our readers have seen,
masters of the field. The junction of the Prussians was a part of
Wellington’s combinations for the battle. Their flank movement at
Waterloo was similar to Desaix’s from Novi to Marengo; with this
no small difference, that upon Bulow’s troops joining, they found
the allied army firm and unbroken, and rather in advance of their
position of the morning[99]: when Desaix joined Bonaparte, he was in
full retreat, one wing of his army destroyed, and obliged to change
his whole front to save the rest from destruction; this eventually
gave him the victory. We are not astonished that the French should
employ this argument as a balm to their disappointment, but it comes
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account