A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
“It is our duty, it is the interest of all of us, more even, I
think, than that it is the duty of the French government, to prevent
those acts of devastation; and I believe that there is no one who
has endeavoured to do this duty so much as I have. But, _M. le
général_, you know what armies are; and I appeal to your judgment:
is it possible entirely to prevent such occurences in such an army
as is under my command; particularly when the soldier is excited by
the remembrance of the evils which he and his relatives have had to
endure at the hands of French troops?...
“WELLINGTON.”
(_Gurwood_, vol. XII, p. 685-6.)
_To H.R.H. Prince Frederick of Orange._
“PARIS, November 10th, 1815.
“I send you a letter I have just received from general comte
de Vaubois, concerning the damages done by the soldiers of the
Netherlands.
“You will see that their officers were not present at their bivac ...
and that the damage done by them amounts to 30,000 francs, a sum ten
times greater perhaps than the general will have to pay, as his part
of the contribution to the allies, in five years. It is clearly of
great importance that the allies prevent these irregularities.
“WELLINGTON.”
(_Gurwood_, vol. XII, page 686.)
Many have been pleased to say that the duke of Wellington both
could and ought to have interposed to save marshal Ney from being
ignominiously executed. Without entering into the question, whether
Ney was a perjured traitor to Louis XVIII, and if so, what was the
meetest punishment for his treason, it may be confidently averred
that Napoleon would have spared no man under similar circumstances.
The following documents are worthy of attention:
MEMORANDUM
RESPECTING MARSHAL NEY.
“PARIS, November 19th, 1815.
“It is extraordinary that Madame la maréchale Ney should have thought
proper to publish in print parts of a conversation which she is
supposed to have had with the duke of Wellington; and that she has
omitted to publish that which is a much better record of the Duke’s
opinion on the subject to which the conversation related; viz. the
Duke’s letter to the maréchal prince de la Moskowa, in answer to the
maréchal’s note to his Grace. That letter was as follows:
“November, 14th, 1815.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account