A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815Cotton, Edward
History
A voice from Waterloo: A history of the battle fought on the 18th June, 1815
Cotton, Edward
Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
With this additional force, Ney had a stupendous body of cavalry in
comparison with ours. The attack, like the previous ones, was covered
by a tremendous fire of artillery, which played on every part of
our right wing; the round-shot ploughing up the ground, or tearing
open the files of the close and serried ranks; shells exploding in
all directions; and at every moment the flashes of the guns, amidst
expanding volumes of dense smoke, challenging the attention of every
man to the sources of destruction, the well-worked batteries on both
sides. Nothing could be more imposing than the advance of Ney’s
cavalry, (flanked by infantry to assail our advanced posts,) as they
swept up the slope of the allied position under a murderous fire of
our double-shotted guns, of which they again succeeded in getting
temporary possession. Our devoted squares at times seemed lost amidst
the hostile squadrons, who, in vain, made repeated endeavours to
penetrate these impregnable barriers; as before, their squadrons
got mixed, broken, and their ardour sobered down, when a retrograde
movement was commenced, which soon became general.
The allied cavalry, who had been kept in hand to act at the
favourable moment, now darted forward and completed the
disorganization of the French cavalry. Our undaunted artillery-men,
ever on the alert, were to be found at their guns, plying the
retiring hostile cavalry with grape, canister, or case-shot.
But the enemy’s cavalry, which frequently reformed in the valley
just under our position, where their lances and the tops of their
caps might be seen, were soon again on the position and amongst the
squares. Some of the most daring would ride up to the squares and
cut aside the bayonets. Such parties seldom escaped unhurt: the man,
or horse, was almost sure to be brought down; but not near so many
saddles were emptied as might have been expected.
During the attacks made by the French cavalry, not a single
individual set an example of soldier-like devotedness by rushing
upon the bristling bayonets: certainly no agreeable task, nor to
be attempted without imminent danger; but one, when required and
gallantly done, that raises men to military rank and renown, and that
may hasten the crisis and lead to victory. Of the fifteen thousand
French horsemen, it is doubtful whether any perished on a British
bayonet, or that any of our infantry in square fell by the French
cavalry’s sabres; few, comparatively, of the enemy’s cavalry were
destroyed, even by our musketry[44].
Many pretend that good infantry in square can resist the onset of
cavalry, however skilful, bold and determined: my opinion is the
reverse; much depends on circumstances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account