A Week in Wall Street: By One Who KnowsJackson, Frederick
General
A Week in Wall Street: By One Who Knows
Jackson, Frederick
Wall Street (New York, N.Y.)
When the gallant Col. Nicholls had, in the name of the crown of Great
Britain, taken full possession of the city and territory of New
Amsterdam, and bestowed upon it the name of his patron the Duke of
York; by way of conciliating the Burghers, he left them undisturbed
in all their civil and domestic privileges, without embarrassing them
with the intricacies of British laws. And in those days of simple
legislation, the government had not yet learned the way to purchase
power, and make people dishonest, by selling corporate privileges. And
demagogues had not yet learned to claim the monopoly, as a reward for
their intrigues. Consequently, Mr. Single-Eye, and his coadjutors in
the matter of the Wall-street Stock Company, had the power of fixing
things all their own way; that is, they made all their own laws,
rules, and regulations, without let or hindrance of any kind. And so
ingeniously were they contrived, that, by their natural operation, the
money which came in by subscription, all leaked out again exactly at
the right place and at the right time. Since that time, the wisdom of
the Legislators of most of the states has decreed, that people shall
not associate in bodies for purposes of roguery, without first buying
a licence; and, under the name of Charters, they will sell licences to
cheat the public, as the Pope sells plenary indulgences, to replenish a
wasted Treasury, (_vide the great state of Pennsylvania and the U. S.
Bank._)
WHAT A DIRECTOR SHOULD BE.
It is worthy of remark and imitation, that neither the president nor
the cashier of the Wall-street Stock Company ever ran away with a
dollar of their money; so rigid a _surveillance_ did Mr. Single-Eye
keep over its affairs. Although nothing but a director himself, he
held the true doctrine, that directors should really be the head of an
institution, and that the president and cashier were merely heads of
the clerks. Mr. Single-Eye was moreover of opinion, that it was better
for a director to hustle the money into his own pocket, and make sure
of the gain, than to suffer another to do it, and incur the odium
himself. To be sure, he was somewhat at variance with Mr. Broker on
this point, but Single-Eye had the power, and there is nothing like
that for enforcing a good reason.
DEGENERACY OF OUR DAYS.
And here I cannot forbear to remark on the degeneracy of these days,
when directors so often give up all management to the presidents and
cashiers, thus leading them into temptation, and provoking them to
do that, which they might do themselves with greater safety, because
they are less immediately responsible. Alas! how many men, with their
families, have been ruined by this cruel lack of vigilance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account