"Specifically, labor satisfies the desire of our personality, which tends invincibly to make a difference between itself and others, _to render itself independent_, _to conquer its liberty_ and its character." Prove then that women have no special work, and, if facts contradict you, acknowledge that, it inevitably tends to _independence_, to _liberty_. Do you deny that they are your equals because they are less intelligent as a whole than men? In the first place, I contest it; but I need not do so, you yourself resolve this difficulty in the "Creation of Order in Humanity:" "The inequality of capacities, when not caused by constitutional vices, mutilation or want, results from general ignorance, insufficient method, lack or falsity of education, and divergence of intuition through lack of sequence, whence arises dispersion and confusion of ideas. Now, all these facts productive of inequality are essentially abnormal, therefore the inequality of capacities is abnormal." Unless you prove that women are mutilated by Nature, I do not exactly see how you can escape the consequences of your syllogism: not only has feminine inferiority the same sources as masculine ignorance, but public education is refused to women, the great professional schools are closed to them, those who through their intellect equal the most intelligent among you have had twenty times as many difficulties and prejudices to overcome. You wish to subordinate women because in general they have less muscular force than you; but at this rate the weak men ought not to be the equals of the strong, and you combat this consequence yourself in your first "Memoir on Property," where you say: "Social equilibrium is the equalization of the strong and the weak." If I have treated you with consideration, it is because you are an intelligent and progressive man, and because it is impossible that you should remain under the influence of the doctors of the Middle Age on one question, while you are in advance of the majority of your cotemporaries on so many others. You will cease to sustain an illogical series that is without foundation, remembering, as you have said so well in the "Creation of Order in Humanity:" "That the greater part of philosophical aberrations and chimeras have arisen from attributing to logical series a reality that they do not possess, and endeavoring to explain the nature of man by abstractions." You will acknowledge that all the higher animal species are composed of two sexes; That in none is the female the inferior of the male, except sometimes through force, which cannot be the basis of human right; You will renounce the androgynus, which is only a dream. Woman, a distinct individual, endowed with consciousness, intellect, will and activity like man, will be no longer separated from him before the laws. You will say of all, both men and women, as in your first "Memoir on Property:"