A Woman's Philosophy of Woman; or, Woman affranchised.: An answer to Michelet, Proudhon, Girardin, Legouvé, Comte, and other modern innovatorsHéricourt, Madame d'
Philosophy
A Woman's Philosophy of Woman; or, Woman affranchised.: An answer to Michelet, Proudhon, Girardin, Legouvé, Comte, and other modern innovators
Héricourt, Madame d'
Women's rights -- France
"No, Madam, you know nothing of your sex; you do not know the
first word of the question that you and your honorable
confederates are agitating with so much noise and so little
success. And, if you do not comprehend this question; if, in your
eight pages of reply to my letter, there are forty paralogisms,
it results precisely, as I have told you, from your _sexual
infirmity_. I mean by this word, the exactness of which is not,
perhaps, irreproachable, the quality of your understanding, which
permits you to seize the relation of things only as far as we,
men, place your finger upon them. You have in the brain, as in
the body, a certain organ incapable by itself of overcoming its
native inertia, and which the masculine spirit alone is capable
of setting in motion; and even this does not always succeed.
Such, Madam, is the result of my direct and positive
observations; I make them over to your obstetrical sagacity, and
leave you to calculate therefrom the incalculable consequences to
your thesis.
"I will willingly enter into an elaborate discussion with you,
Madam, on this obscure subject, in the _Revue Philosophique_.
But--as you will comprehend as well as I--the broader the
question, the more it affects our most sacred, social, and
domestic interests, the more important is it that we should
approach it with seriousness and prudence.
"The following course, therefore, appears to me indispensable:
In the first place, you have promised us a book, and I await it.
I need this work to complete my documents and to finish my
demonstration. Since I had the honor of receiving and replying to
your letter, I have made earnest and interesting studies on
woman, which I ask only to rectify if they are erroneous; as I
also desire to set a seal on them if, as I have every reason to
presume, your publication brings me but one confirmation more.
"I have verified by facts and documents the truth of all the
assertions which you call on me to retract, namely:
"That the difference of sex raises up between man and woman a
separation ANALOGOUS--I did not say equal--to that which the
difference of races and species establishes between animals;
"That by reason of this separation or difference, man and woman
are not _associates_; I did not say that they could not be
anything else;
"That, consequently, woman can only be a _citizen_ in so far as
she is the wife of a citizen; as we say _Madame la Presidente_ to
the wife of a President: which does not imply that no other rôle
exists for her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account