A Woman's Philosophy of Woman; or, Woman affranchised.: An answer to Michelet, Proudhon, Girardin, Legouvé, Comte, and other modern innovators — John Shaqi
A Woman's Philosophy of Woman; or, Woman affranchised.: An answer to Michelet, Proudhon, Girardin, Legouvé, Comte, and other modern innovatorsHéricourt, Madame d'
Philosophy
A Woman's Philosophy of Woman; or, Woman affranchised.: An answer to Michelet, Proudhon, Girardin, Legouvé, Comte, and other modern innovators
Héricourt, Madame d'
Women's rights -- France
With regard to autopsies, you tell me that you are awaiting my
promised work, in order to make mine. It would be doubtless a
great honor to be stretched on your dissecting table in such good
company as you promise me, but the instruction of my future
readers does not permit me to enjoy this satisfaction. I shall
not send my book to press until your own shall have appeared, for
I, too, intend to make your autopsy; dissect me therefore now; I
promise you on my side that I will perform my duty
conscientiously, properly and delicately.
"Woman," you say, "being weaker than man with respect to
_muscular force_, is not less inferior to him with respect to
INDUSTRIAL, ARTISTIC, PHILOSOPHICAL AND MORAL POWER; so that if
the condition of woman in society be regulated, as you demand for
her, _by the same justice as the condition of man_, it is all
over with her; she is a slave."
Terrible man, you will be then always inconsistent, you will
always contradict yourself and facts!
What do you hold as the basis of right? _The simple quality of
being human_; everything that distinguishes individuals
disappears before right. Well! even though it were true that
women were inferior to men, would it follow that their rights
were not the same? According to you, by no means, if they form a
part of the human species. There are not two kinds of justice,
there is but one; there are not two kinds of right, there is but
one in the absolute sense. The recognition and respect of
individual autonomy in the lowest of human beings as well as in
the man and woman of genius is the law which should preside over
social relations; must a woman tell you this!
Let us now examine the value of your series of _man and woman_.
With respect to the reproduction of the species, they form a
series; this is beyond dispute.
As to the rest, do they form a series? No.
_If it were a law_ that woman is _muscularly_ weaker than man,
the strongest woman would be weaker than the weakest man; facts
demonstrate the contrary daily.
_If it were a law_ that women are inferior to men in _industrial
power_, the most skillful woman would be inferior in industrial
pursuits to the least skillful man; now facts demonstrate daily
that there are women who are excellent manufacturers and
excellent managers; men who are unskilled in and unsuited to this
kind of pursuits.
_If it were a law_ that women are inferior to men in _artistic
power_, the best female artist would be inferior to the most
indifferent male artist; now facts daily demonstrate the
contrary; there are more great female than male tragedians; many
men are mediocre in music and painting, and many women, on the
other hand, remarkable in both respects, etc., etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account