Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
I have been staying for the last three days in the country quite close
to Moscow. I thought I should get away for a time from politics, from
talk of new Cabinets, new eras, liberal autocracy, strong-handed reform,
and other such pleasing illusions. I was mistaken. Politics filter
through everywhere now; in a third-class railway carriage, at the
station buffets, in the public parks, in the villages.
As regards the various opinions I heard expressed the prevailing one is
this: that the new Prime Minister’s programme of strong-handed Liberal
reform is a repetition of the programme of the last five Ministers of
the Interior.
M. Stolypin says these last five Premiers were all mistaken in their
policy; in the meantime (people say) it is difficult to see in what
respects his programme is to differ from theirs. And we have no evidence
as yet that M. Stolypin is an infinitely more capable man than Count
Witte. Some people, referring to the official denial of the article that
appeared in the semi-official newspaper _Rossia_, with regard to foreign
intervention, say: “If M. Stolypin cannot control the first page of his
official newspaper, how can he expect to control Russia?” Others
commenting on his intention to initiate social reform and put a stop to
the political movement, say that this effort is the very root and kernel
of the whole trouble in Russia; that the mistake of would-be reformers
has always consisted in their not understanding that social reforms are
impossible unless they are preceded by political reforms. (M.
Leroy-Beaulieu, in his splendid book on Russia, writes in a most
illuminating fashion on this very point.)
As regards what is actually happening in Moscow, the town is empty and
quiet; public meetings are forbidden, small political gatherings in
private houses are held only under surveillance of the police;
gatherings of the “Black Gang” are said to be allowed; the Press is
certainly subjected to a rigid censorship; the _Morning Post_ arrived
blacked out yesterday for the first time for two years; the manifesto of
the ex-members is being spread, likewise the manifesto of the Social
Democrats. I have not seen anybody who thinks that an era of peace and
resigned content has begun.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account