Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
and repression will prevent them, and if the private houses of St.
Petersburg are to be subjected to indiscriminate bombardment the outlook
is indeed serious. Other results are these. The soldiers have been
proved to be loyal, but a Government cannot subsist on bayonets alone.
Again, there will be a large number of workmen out of work; these men
when they go back to their villages will be met with some such remarks
as these: “No money. You struck? What for? Get out.”
These two last mentioned facts should make strikes in the future more
difficult. Some people say that nothing will pacify the revolutionaries;
possibly, but the important question is, how far will the
revolutionaries be supported by public opinion? That depends entirely on
the action of the Government. It is certainly untrue to say that public
opinion in Moscow was against the revolutionaries, if it is an
exaggeration to say that it supported them. This leads us to another
question: What do the people here think of it all? In answer I can only
repeat what I said in my last letter: there exists violent and bitter
partisanship on both sides; there exists also a large class of onlookers
which is half-indifferent, half-resigned, and half-sceptical—in the main
indifferent. But if one is to go by facts one can point to the small
crowd—a selected and, in some parts, I believe, a paid crowd of men—who
attended the manifestation for the Emperor’s birthday, the vast crowd
which attended Bauman’s funeral, and the great numbers of working men
and others who have been fighting against the Government these last few
days. When I was talking to the wounded soldiers to-day in the hospital
they told me that they had heard from men returning from the Far East
that the reports of a large mutiny in the Army there were untrue, that
there had been discontent about not coming home and a small rising, but
nothing like what was reported. One man said to me: “We may ask for more
soup and meat, but is it likely we are going to mutiny for that? They
will give us more if we ask for it; soldiers can’t strike, it is as if
the whole population were to strike.” I refrained from pointing out that
this is what exactly had occurred in October. I answered by my simile of
the starving man who is suddenly given champagne.
To-day I tried the Sortes Virgilianæ with regard to the present
situation and the chief actors of the drama of Russia. The result was as
follows:
1. (For Count Witte)
“dextra discedens impulit altam
Haud ignara modi puppim.”—Æ. x. 245.
2. (The general situation)
“Extemplo turbati animi, concussaque vulgi
Pectora, et arrectæ stimulis haud mollibus iræ.
Arma manu trepidi poscunt; fremit arma juventus,
Flent mæsti mussantque patres. Hic undique clamor
Dissensu vario magnus se tollit in auras.”
Æ. xi. 451.
_January 2nd._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account