Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
I arrived at St. Petersburg this morning. I have been trying to
formulate my reactionary feelings. I will put them on paper; although I
know I shall only have to spend a very short time with real
reactionaries to be driven straight back into the opposite camp. But
lately at Moscow I have had a heavy dose of anti-governmental
unfairness. Too heavy for the present, although perhaps I shall one day
in the future think that it was not unfair at all.
I asked a man the other day, who is employed in the “Zemstva,” what
party he belonged to. “I belong to the party of common sense,” he
answered; “unfortunately it does not exist.” This exactly sums up, I
think, the impression that any impartial observer must necessarily
derive from the present situation in Russia. Common sense has gone.
Hysteria and undisciplined rant have taken its place.
First, the revolutionaries. There are two kinds of revolutionaries: the
active, who throw bombs at policemen and soldiers, who are ready to dare
anything and sacrifice themselves; and the passive revolutionaries who
sit at home and sympathise and talk a great deal. What is their point of
view?
1. They consider that all classes who are not definitely enrolled under
their flag are violent reactionaries and are fit to be classed with the
“Black Hundred.” The Duma that is to be, they say, will be a “Black
Hundred” Duma; the present Government is purely and simply a reactionary
Government composed of bureaucrats, and no good can come to Russia until
the ulcer is pierced to the core, and all bureaucrats, together with the
Emperor and all his family, and all his Court, are removed. The
objection that the present Government is merely temporary until the Duma
assembles, they meet with the counterargument that the Government, with
the franchise law as it is, is capable of influencing the elections to
any extent, and that the result will be a reactionary Duma.
2. The second question is—What do they want? They say they want a
Constituent Assembly and universal suffrage, and no doubt they do want
this. But whether they would be satisfied with this if they were given
it is another question. Personally, my experience has so far led me to
believe that they would in no wise be satisfied with this; I would lay
odds to this effect. I may, no doubt, be mistaken. I believe what they
really want is for Russia to become a federation of autonomous States
represented by a Republic. Some of the more moderate are either opposed
to this or refrain from stating any opinion in favour of it, owing to
the fact that they know that the Army and ninety million peasants are
ready to kill any one within reach if the “Gasudar” is to be tampered
with.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account