A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
The manifest consequences of such a preposterous recognition of
separatism, the inevitable feebleness and disingenuousness of a
League based upon such ideas, were pointed out as early as May 1918
in a memorandum issued by the official propaganda organisation of
the British Government at Crewe House. Crewe House was rather a
thorn in the side of the dear old British Foreign Office; in 1918
it was asking for a definition of Allied war aims and all sorts of
inconvenient, honest questions. The memorandum was treated according to
the best diplomatic precedents. Although we were making it the basis
of extravagant promises to Germany, it was never communicated, as it
should have been, to the French and Italians. At the end of the war
the promises of Crewe House dropped out of the victorious picture. The
reasoning and the warnings of this memorandum were entirely ignored by
the hasty gentlemen at Versailles who threw together the Geneva League
of Nations.
These gentlemen seem to have been profoundly influenced by an infantile
analogy between a sovereign State and an individual man. This is the
age of democracy; and the League, most marvellous formula! was “to
make the world safe for democracy.” Modern democracy is taken to mean
so much political equality between adult and adult as may be achieved
by giving each individual a vote. What more easy or--if you think it
out--more fallacious than to transfer this idea to sovereign States and
give each of them a vote in a wonderful congress of mankind? But one
sovereign State is not like another sovereign State, as one individual
man is like another; the difference between this sovereign State and
that is far profounder even than the difference between animals of
different classes. The difference in structure, complexity, function,
and destiny, for example, between the organisation known as the United
States of America and that known as Nicaragua is a difference as wide
as that between the whole plant of a great industrial district and
a small domestic mangle. But in the original Covenant of the League
both were treated as individuals differing only a little in size and
importance. Liberia, Belgium, France, Hayti, and the Hedjaz were all
to be--and they are!--citizens in this marvellous republic of States.
It is like treating a jar of pickles, an opera house, a battleship, a
bundle of sugar-cane, and a small travelling bag as equivalent things.
Any old thing with a flag on it--that is the rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account