A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
He goes on to a denunciation of my republicanism. Ignoring steamships,
banking, Imperial Preference, and a common language, he declares the
only sure link of the Empire is “the golden circle of an ancient
crown.” I would hate to say anything in detraction of a devoted and
indefatigable royal family, but I do not believe that there is any
effective imperial binding force in the cult of snobbery and sentiment,
of which its members are at once the divinities and the sacrificial
victims. The healthy natural man is a republican, and has a stiff
backbone. Nobody really loves or respects a courtier. One of the chief
troubles in the Irish settlement has been the excessive distaste of
many Irishmen for the forms of royalty. One of the chief barriers
between the British and closer co-operation with America is this
king-business. The true cement of our communities must be the sense of
equal brotherhood and common aims.
After that Mr. Churchill lapses into sheer naughtiness. There are
times when the evil spirit comes upon him and when I can think of
him only as a very intractable little boy, a mischievous, dangerous
little boy, a knee-worthy little boy. Only by thinking of him in that
way can one go on liking him. Suddenly he breaks out about Russia, and
I am reminded that he has been one of the chief afflictions of that
unfortunate country, that he was largely responsible for the waste
of scores of million pounds of British money, in arming first one
brigand chief and then another to attack and further devastate our
war-exhausted ally.
He is still unrepentant. He declares that I was a passionate and am now
a disappointed pro-Bolshevik, although I have always been an austere
critic and witness of Bolshevik incompetence and unpracticalness. But I
have also borne my witness to the fact that the Bolshevik leaders are
mainly honest men, fighting against stupendous difficulties and leading
hard lives, and that the Russian people would far rather have them as
its rulers than any of the vicious, plundering, pogromming White Hopes
and Czarist reactionaries patronised by Mr. Churchill. These Russians
have fought against tremendous difficulties against invading Japanese,
Poles, Esthonians, French-subsidised invaders and British-subsidised
invaders, and against famine and a pitiless blockade, and against their
own ignorance and the atrociously rough and cruel legacy of Czarism,
and it seems as if after all they will pull through and lay the
foundations of a renascent Russia.
And this is the handful of mud this English statesman hurls at the
struggling rulers of this great land with which we are at peace. “They
are just a selfish, plundering crew of tyrants and parasites who
descended upon an unhappy land and enslaved or slaughtered its people,
soiled its honour, ruined its prosperity, devoured its substance, and
enriched themselves and their female belongings.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account