A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
And the party managers, of all three parties, will be scheming some
new electoral law before the next election. None of them will hear of
honest proportional representation with large constituencies and a
smaller, more efficient House of Commons; but they will all be planning
something that will look fair and honest, leave the party system
intact, and advantage the Parliamentary party to which each belongs.
In this matter the Labour Party is no more honest than any other. Its
party organs discuss the question entirely from the party point of
view, and are quite disposed to consider “the alternative vote” or any
other shabby evasion of proper electoral methods. So that at the end of
our vista we must reckon with an election faked perhaps in some novel
way but just as absurd as the last one.
And so Great Britain muddles through the years of destiny.
XVIII
MODERN GOVERNMENT: PARLIAMENT AND REAL ELECTORAL REFORM
22.1.24
We are assured that a reform of the electoral system is now imminent
in Great Britain. The oldest and most respectable of the world’s
democratic governments is declared to be in need of repair and
reconstruction. It has produced three parties without a majority, and
it threatens to jam. Immediate legislation is promised. This must needs
be a matter of lively interest to every intelligent person from China
to Peru.
For the British Parliament is the Mother of Parliaments. This is
the proud boast of the conventional teacher of British history (as
distinguished from history), and--subject to a footnote by Mr.
Belloc--it is reasonably true. The prevalent type of governing body
in the world has been constructed more or less in imitation or as a
variation of the respected British pattern; there is an Upper House
whose members are supposed to be more select and genteel and important,
and a Lower House which, generally speaking, wrangles more, is more
representative of and more in the spirit of the common people, has
taxing power, and is more conspicuously and fussily elected by the
general population. The reasons commonly alleged for this double
chamber system are pedantic and ridiculous, but the States that have
been organised or modernised in the past three centuries have followed
one another in the matter with all that unquestioning readiness which
distinguishes man and the sheep and the processional caterpillar from
most other of God’s animated creatures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account