A year of prophesyingWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A year of prophesying
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Civilization, Modern -- 20th century; Europe -- History -- 20th century; Great Britain -- History -- 20th century
The members of one or both of these chambers or houses are elected,
and the system of election remains so primitive and stupid as to
leave a large minority, or even a majority, of the electors not even
represented in the House. The procedure is infantile--in the British
Parliament the members vote by sprinting past a teller and through
a lobby and along passages and so forth back to their seats--and
generally these Parliaments, Congresses, and Legislative Chambers are
about as well fitted to serve the needs of our complicated modern
communities as a battleship of Queen Elizabeth’s navy is fitted to
encounter modern artillery.
But they are difficult to scrap and reconstruct because the only
people legally capable of scrapping and reconstructing them are the
politicians they have created, and who are completely adapted to their
necessities. You cannot expect “Old Parliamentary Hands” and such-like
gentry to modify or even to realise the disastrous inefficiency of
the political devices by which they live and move and have their
being. Most of the Latin communities, which are logical to the pitch
of violence, have solved the problem of Parliamentary incompetence
in their hasty way by accepting dictators who treat all elected
representatives with a scarcely veiled contempt; and even the English,
in the face of a supreme national crisis, acquiesced in Cromwell....
Of course, after I have written that last sentence nothing will prevent
the world-wide society of the muddle-headed from running away with
the idea that I advocate dictatorships, just as it was impossible
to prevent them from declaring that I had “embraced Protection”
after I had pointed out that tariffs, like war, follow naturally
upon nationalism, and just as they would certainly have it that I
want to promote typhoid fever if I were to write about the necessary
consequences of insanitary conditions. But that is a digression.
Dictatorships are evil consequences of democratic break-downs. They
are the rough remedy for intolerable democracy. And except in the
United States democracies are becoming very generally intolerable. The
people of the United States, for the time the spoilt children of the
human race, are so fortunate in their isolation and their vast unity
that the efficiency of their Government is a matter of no immediate
concern to them. They will perhaps get along with their unwieldy
Congress and their dear two historical parties for a long time yet. The
British behind their silver streak had something of the same immunity
before the war. They were still in a phase of financial and economic
good luck. It is over for them now. In Britain politics have become
serious and vital, and under existing conditions the overstrained and
impoverished community can no longer suffer the elaborate fooleries of
party government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account