London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
On the hill was the house of Mr. Coniers, Bencher and Treasurer of the
Middle Temple, from which, on the 3rd of June, 1611, the Lady Arabella
escaped. Her sin was that she had married Mr. Seymour, afterwards
Marquis of Hertford. Her fate was sad; she was recaptured and died in
the Tower. Sir Richard Baker, author of “The Chronicles of the Kings of
England,” resided at Highgate. Dr. Sacheverel, that foolish priest, died
at Highgate. But a greater man than any we have yet named lived here. I
speak of S. T. Coleridge, who lived in a red-brick house in the “Grove”
twenty years, with his biographer, Mr. Gillman, which house is now
inhabited by Mr. Blatherwick, surgeon. It is much to be regretted that
Gillman’s Life was never completed, but a monument in the new church, and
a grave in the old churchyard, mark the philosopher’s connection with
Highgate. Carlyle has given us a description of what he calls
Coleridge’s philosophical moonshine. I met a lady who remembers the
philosopher well, as a snuffy old gentleman, very fond of stroking her
hair, and seeing her and another little girl practise their dancing
lessons. On one occasion Irving came with the philosopher. As the great
man’s clothes were very shabby, and as he took so much snuff as to make
her sneeze whenever she went near him, my lady informant had rather a
poor opinion of the author of “Christabel” and the “Ancient Mariner.” A
contemporary writer, more akin in philosophy to Coleridge than Thomas
Carlyle, and more able to appreciate the wondrous intellect of the man
than the little lady to whom I have already referred, says, “I was in his
company about three hours, and of that time he spoke during two and
three-quarters. It would have been delightful to listen as attentively,
and certainly as easy for him to speak just as well, for the next
forty-eight hours. On the whole, his conversation, or rather monologue,
is by far the most interesting I ever read or heard of. Dr. Johnson’s
talk, with which it is obvious to compare it, seems to me immeasurably
inferior. It is better balanced and squared, and more ponderous with
epithets, but the spirit and flavour and fragrance, the knowledge and the
genius, are all wanting. The one is a house of brick, the other a quarry
of jasper. It is painful to observe in Coleridge, that with all the
kindness and glorious far-seeing intelligence of his eye, there is a
glare in it, a light half-unearthly and morbid. It is the glittering eye
of the Ancient Mariner. His cheek too shows a flush of over-excitement,
the ridge of a storm-cloud at sunset. When he dies, another, and the
greatest of their race, will rejoin the few immortals, the ill-understood
and ill-requited, who have walked this earth.” Had Coleridge ever a more
genial visitant than the farmer-looking, but eloquent and philanthropic
Chalmers, who in 1839 came from Scotland to London, and of course clomb
up Highgate Hill to pay a visit to Coleridge, he says—“Half-an-hour with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account