London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
one of them was the sister of the deceased peer. Lord John Russell also
exhibited an emotion for which the general public will scarce give him
credit. At the grave he was so much overcome, that it seemed as if he
would have fallen had not the Duke of Argyle held him up. Well might his
Lordship be moved to tears. Could he keep from thinking, while standing
there, how soon his own turn would come, and how well and worthily he,
who slept the sleep of death in the plain coffin at his feet, had fought
the battle of the Whigs in their palmy days? We looked back, as we stood
there, to other days. We saw a theatre in Gower Street filled with
intelligent youths. A winter session had been closed: all its work and
competition were over; to the successful candidates prizes were to be
awarded. The fathers and mothers, the friends and sisters of such had
come together from far and near. Seated in a chair was a stout, mild,
genial man, with face somewhat pale, and hair scant and inclined to grey.
He rose, and was received with rapturous applause; he spoke in plain
language—with little action, with a voice rather inclined to be harsh—of
the bright future which rises before the rapt eye of youth. He spoke—and
as he did so, as he mounted from one climax to another, every young heart
filled and warmed with the speaker’s theme. That was Macaulay, just come
from India, with an honourable competence, to consummate the fame as a
man he had acquired in younger years. Again, we thought of that last
speech in the House of Commons, when, at an early hour on a beautiful
summer evening, the Parks, and Clubs, and Rotten Row had been deserted,
for it had gone forth to the world that Macaulay was about to speak.
Poor Joseph Hume had moved the adjournment of the debate, and, as a
matter of right, was in possession of the House; but the calls for
Macaulay on all sides were so numerous, that even that most good-natured
of men, as Hume was, grew a little angry and remonstrated; but it was in
vain that he sought the attention of the House: all were anxious for the
next speaker, and no sooner had Hume sat down than Macaulay delivered, in
his hurried feverish way, one of those speeches which not merely delight,
but which influence men’s votes and opinions, and may be read with
delight when the occasion which gave rise to them has long since passed
away. We have heard much in favour of competition in the civil service,
at home and in India, since then, but never was the argument more clearly
put—more copiously illustrated, more clothed in grace and beauty; and
then came a few short years of infirmity of body, of labour with the pen,
and sudden death, and the burial at Westminster Abbey. Out of the
thousands standing by the grave, few could ever expect to see the career
of such another genius. He is gone, and we may not hope to see his work
finished. In vain we call up him—
“Who left untold,
The story of Cambuscan bold.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account