Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 1 (of 16) — John Shaqi
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 1 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 1 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
That all questions shall be put by the President of the
Senate, either in the presence or absence of the President
of the United States; and the Senators shall signify their
assent or dissent by answering _viva voce_, aye or no.[8]
Another message was received from the President, viz:
_Gentlemen of the Senate:_
The President of the United States will meet the Senate, in
the Senate Chamber, at half-past eleven o'clock to-morrow,
to advise with them on the terms of the treaty to be
negotiated with the Southern Indians.
GEO. WASHINGTON.
NEW YORK, _August 21, 1789_.
SATURDAY, August 22.
The Senate again entered on executive business.
The President of the United States came into the Senate Chamber,
attended by General Knox, and laid before the Senate the following
statement of facts, with the questions thereto annexed, for their advice
and consent:
[Here follows the statement of facts, and the questions
thereto annexed, and the answer of the Senate to each
question.]
MONDAY, August 24.
The Senate was to-day wholly engaged in executive business.
The President of the United States being present in the Senate Chamber,
attended by General Knox,
The Senate resumed the consideration of the state of facts and questions
thereto annexed, laid before them by the President of the United States,
on Saturday last. And the first question, viz: "In the present state of
affairs between North Carolina and the United States, will it be proper
to take any other measures for redressing the injuries of the Cherokees
than the one herein suggested?" being put, was answered in the
negative.[9]
The third question, viz: "If the commissioners shall adjudge that the
Creek nation was fully represented at the three treaties with Georgia,
and that the cessions of land were obtained with the full understanding
and free consent of the acknowledged proprietors, and that the said
treaties ought to be considered as just and equitable: in this case,
shall the commissioners be instructed to insist on a formal renewal and
confirmation thereof? and, in case of a refusal, shall they be
instructed to inform the Creeks that the arms of the Union shall be
employed to compel them to acknowledge the justice of the said
cessions?" was wholly answered in the affirmative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account