Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)United States. Congress
History
Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 2 (of 16)
United States. Congress
Law -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
"_Resolved_, That the Secretary of the Treasury be directed
to lay before the House of Representatives, within the
first week of January next, abstracts of the accounts of
all paymasters, quartermasters, contractors, agents for the
purchase of supplies, and generally of all the Receivers of
Public Moneys, paid from the Treasury from the 1st of
January, 1791, to the 1st of January, 1797, on account of
the Military Establishment, so as to exhibit a detailed
statement of the whole amount of moneys thus expended to
that period; and whether any of the accounts be not finally
settled; and shall lay before the House an estimate of
moneys not accounted for.
"_Resolved_, That the Secretary of the Treasury be directed
to lay, at the same time, before the House of
Representatives similar abstracts of the accounts of all
the Receivers of Public Money expended for the building of
the frigates.
"_Resolved_, That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of
the Treasury to lay before the House of Representatives,
within the last week of January in each year, a statement
of money expended for the Military Establishment during the
next preceding year, distinguishing the sums expended under
each head, for which specific appropriations have been
made, and an estimate of the probable unsettled demands in
relation to each of those heads."
The resolutions were severally agreed to.
EVENING SESSION.
_Military and Naval Appropriations._
The bill appropriating money for the Military and Naval Establishments,
was received from the Senate with an amendment, proposing to do away the
restriction which had been introduced into the bill to confine the
expenditure of money to the specific objects for which each sum is
appropriated.
Mr. DANA hoped the House would recede from the amendment.
Mr. GALLATIN said that, by the constitution, no money was to be granted
but by a law passed in the regular mode. Now, said Mr. G., this is not
by law, if, after a certain sum is granted for one item, it be not used
for that purpose, but put to some other object. This was certainly
according to the spirit of the constitution, and if you do not strictly
abide by that, you may as well set aside the constitution, and say we
will appropriate $6,000,000 for the support of Government for the
present year. If we mean to carry the constitution into effect we must
reject the amendment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account