Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800; Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
§§1--12. Summary. Lucullus, though an able and cultivated man, was
absent from Rome on public service too long during his earlier years to
attain to glory in the forum (1). He unexpectedly proved a great
general. This was due to his untiring study and his marvellous memory
(2). He had to wait long for the reward of his merits as a commander
and civil administrator, and was allowed no triumph till just before my
consulship. What I owed to him in those troublous times I cannot now
tell (3). He was not merely a general; he was also a philosopher,
having learned much from Antiochus and read much for himself (4). Those
enemies of Greek culture who think a Roman noble ought not to know
philosophy, must be referred to the examples of Cato and Africanus (5).
Others think that famous men should not be introduced into dialogues of
the kind. Are they then, when they meet, to be silent or to talk about
trifles? I, in applying myself to philosophy, have neglected no public
duty, nor do I think the fame of illustrious citizens diminished, but
enriched, by a reputation for philosophical knowledge (6). Those who
hold that the interlocutors in these dialogues had no such knowledge
show that they can make their envy reach beyond the grave. Some critics
do not approve the particular philosophy which I follow--the Academic.
This is natural, but they must know that Academicism puts no stop to
inquiry (7). My school is free from the fetters of dogma; other schools
are enslaved to authority (8). The dogmatists say they bow to the
authority of the wise man. How can they find out the wise man without
hearing all opinions? This subject was discussed by myself, Catulus,
Lucullus, and Hortensius, the day after the discussion reported in the
_Catulus_ (9). Catulus called on Lucullus to defend the doctrines of
Antiochus. This Lucullus believed himself able to do, although the
doctrines had suffered in the discussion of the day before (10). He
spoke thus: At Alexandria I heard discussions between Heraclitus Tyrius
the pupil of Clitomachus and Philo, and Antiochus. At that very time
the books mentioned by Catulus yesterday came into the hands of
Antiochus, who was so angry that he wrote a book against his old
teacher (11 and 12). I will now give the substance of the disputes
between Heraclitus and Antiochus, omitting the remarks made by the
latter against Philo (12).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account