Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
Our minds are made in that way. They are
fashioned in the school of cause and effect.
Nothing can get out of the universe because there is no out to the
universe. Can that which has no ending have a beginning? Can that
which has no circumference have a center? Can we think of anything
so hot that it could not be hotter? Or so small that it could not
be smaller? Or so big that it could not be bigger? No, because our
minds have been schooled in this comparative method. Our sense shows
us a world of degrees. We can think of absolute darkness, but not
of absolute light. In the Mammoth Cave you may realize absolute
darkness; but even on the sun itself would you experience absolute
light? We seem to be able to find an end to the negative, but not to
the positive. We can think of a body as at absolute rest, but can we
conceive of it going so fast that it could not go faster?
Death is our consciousness of a peculiar change in matter, just as
life is our consciousness of the opposite change--one destructive,
the other constructive. The constituents of the body remain
unchanged, but a peculiar activity set up among the particles,
by what, we know not, is instituted in life and ceases in death.
An organism is made up of organs, all working together, but each
subordinated to the whole. The whole, this concerted action, may
cease, and the individual dies, as we say, and yet the minute
subdivisions, the cells, may be alive. Certain ferments in the body
may go on for some time after the life of the man has gone out. And
living cells may go on multiplying endlessly without producing an
organized being.
II
“It is all right,” said Walt Whitman to me as I was leaving his
death-bed and hearing his voice for the last time--“It is all right.”
Of course it was all right, and it will be all right when each and
all of us fall into the last eternal sleep. Else it would not be.
Our being here is all right, is it not? “Friendly and faithful,”
says Whitman, “are the arms that have helped me,” and friendly and
faithful must be the arms that bear us away. If it was good to come,
it will be good to go--good in the large, cosmic sense, good in that
it is in keeping with the spirit of the All. Not the good of our
brief personal successes and triumphs, but good as evolution is good,
as the processes of growth and decay are good. If life is good, death
must be equally good, as each waits upon the other. From what point
of view can we say that death is not all right? Certainly not from
the point of view of this universe. Archimedes could have moved the
world had he had some other world upon which to place his lever, and
we must have some other universe to plant our feet upon to condemn
death.
As I have already said, we look upon death as an evil because we look
upon it from the happy fields of life, and see ourselves as alive in
our graves and lamenting that we are shut off from all the light and
love and movement of the world. Does our prenatal state seem an evil?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account