Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
The faith and composure of the naturalist or naturist are proof
against the worst that Nature can do. He sees the cosmic forces only;
he sees nothing directly mindful of man, but man himself; he sees the
intelligence and beneficence of the universe flowering in man; he
sees life as a mysterious issue of the warring element; he sees human
consciousness and our sense of right and wrong, of truth and justice,
as arising in the evolutionary sequence, and turning and sitting in
judgment upon all things; he sees that there can be no life without
pain and death; that there can be no harmony without discord; that
opposites go hand in hand; that good and evil are inextricably
mingled; that the sun and blue sky are still there behind the clouds,
unmindful of them; that all is right with the world if we extend our
vision deep enough; that the ways of Nature are the ways of God if we
do not make God in our own image, and make our comfort and well-being
the prime object of Nature. Our comfort and well-being are provided
for in the constitution of the world, but we may say that they are
not guaranteed; they are contingent upon many things, but the chances
are upon our side. He that would save his life shall lose it--lose
it in forgetting that the universe is not a close corporation, or a
patented article, and that it exists for other ends than our own. But
he who can lose his life in the larger life of the whole shall save
it in a deeper, truer sense.
VIII
A FALLACY MADE IN GERMANY
During the Great War the question was asked, “Do the inexorable laws
of evolution apply to human beings as they apply to the lower animals
and to plants?” Most assuredly they do, but with a difference. Man
is as certainly one of the results of the evolutionary process as is
the horse or the dog, the tree or the plant. We are as certain of
his animal origin as we can well be of anything in the biological
history of the globe. But the inference which has so often been
drawn from this fact--namely, that man’s development involves the
same factors, and is along parallel lines--is a fallacy. That the
supremacy of might, which has ruled, and still rules in nature below
man, justifies the rule of might in human communities in our day, is
an invention of perverted human ambition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account