Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalismBurroughs, John
Philosophy
Accepting the universe : $b Essays in naturalism
Burroughs, John
Natural history; Natural history -- Philosophy; Philosophy; Science
The things that are preyed upon are more joyous and contented than
their enemies. The carnivorous animals are solitary and morose; the
birds of prey are the same. The chipmunk seems to have a much better
time than the weasel, the bluebird than the owl that lines its nest
with blue feathers. One might envy the song sparrow, or the vesper
sparrow, or the robin, but never the shrike nor the sharp-skinned
hawk that pursues them. The eagle is a grand bird, but evidently the
lark is much the happier. The jay devours the eggs and the young of
the smaller birds, but these birds greatly outstrip him in the race
of life. The murderers evidently have less joy in their lives than
the murdered. The crow rarely sheds blood, and, compared with the
hawk, he is a happy-all-the-year-round vagabond.
Nature has made the wild creatures fearful of their natural enemies,
and has endowed them with means to escape them; then she has equipped
these enemies with weapons and instincts to defeat this (her own)
purpose. She plays one hand against another. Wild life is divided
into two warring camps, and, as in our own wars, new devices for
defense on the one hand are met with new devices of attack on the
other. The little night rodents have big and sharp eyes, but the owl
that preys upon them has big and sharp eyes also, and his flight is
as silent as a shadow. You see, Nature is impartial; she has the
good of all creatures at heart. If it is good for the hawk to eat
the bird, it is good for the bird to be equipped with swift wings
and sharp eyes to evade the hawk. A little more advantage on either
side and the game would be blocked--the birds would fail or the hawks
would starve. As it is, “the race is to the swift and the battle to
the strong.” Nature keeps the balance. Action and reaction are equal.
The skunk and the porcupine have little or no fear; neither have they
much wit. Their weapons of defense are nearly always ready, and that
of the porcupine acts automatically; that of the skunk is a little
more deliberate and inflicts less pain, but gives great discomfort
and discomfiture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account