Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
What I have stated above as to the use of mirrors with a short focal
distance for lights of great divergence, proceeds on the assumption,
that the penumbral portion of the light on each side of the strongest
beam (which is confined within the limits of the least divergence, due
to that portion of the mirror where the focal distance is the greatest)
is to be pressed into service in the illumination of the horizon;
and it is the chief inconvenience which attends the application of
paraboloïdal mirrors to fixed lights, that because it is impracticable
to apply a number of mirrors sufficient to light the whole horizon with
an equally strong light, spaces occur on either side of each reflector
in which the mariner has a light sensibly inferior to that which
illuminates the sector near the axis of each mirror. This will be best
explained by stating the numerical results of the computations of the
divergence of the mirrors used in the Northern Lights for this purpose,
both at the vertex and the sides. In a mirror whose focal distance is
4 inches, and its greatest double ordinate 21 inches, illuminated by
a flame 1 inch in diameter, we find by computation, that the greatest
divergence is 14° 22′, and that the strongest arc of light is only 5°
16′; a difference so great, that while the one may admit of the horizon
being imperfectly illuminated by means of 26 reflectors, the superior
light which would result from confining the duty of each instrument
within the range of its best effect, could only be obtained by the
use of 68 reflectors, and the expenditure of a proportionately great
quantity of oil, not to speak of the great practical difficulty which
would attend the arrangement of so many lamps in a lantern of moderate
size. In revolving lights, the mirrors are not, as in fixed lights,
inconveniently taxed for horizontal divergence, because each portion of
the divergent beam visits successively each point of the horizon. In
this view of the merits of _fixed_ and _revolving_ lights, I should be
disposed to recommend, in any new organisation of lights with parabolic
reflectors, the adoption, in fixed lights, of reflectors with a short
focal distance and small span, so as to admit of many being ranged
around the frame; while in revolving lights, it would be my aim to
approach the largest size of reflector that could be made, so as if
possible to illuminate each face of the revolving frame by means of a
large lamp in a single mirror, with a great focal distance, thereby
diminishing the difference between the divergence of the powerful cone
of rays reflected from the more distant parts of the mirror and that of
the feebler and more diffuse light from its apex.
~Effect of Paraboloïdal mirrors.~
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account