Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
The maximum luminous effect of the reflectors ordinarily employed in
fixed lights, as determined by observation, is generally equal to
about 350 times the effect of the unassisted flame which is placed in
the focus; while for those employed in revolving lights, which are of
larger size, it is valued at 450. This estimate, however, is strictly
applicable only at the distances at which the observations have been
made, as the proportional value of the reflected beam must necessarily
vary with the distance of the observer, agreeably to some law dependent
upon the unequal distribution of the light in the illuminous cone
which proceeds from it. The effect also varies very much in particular
instruments. The ordinary burners used in lighthouses are one inch
in diameter, and the focal distance generally adopted is 4 inches,
so that the extreme divergence of the mirror in the horizontal plane
may be estimated at about 14° 22′; while the divergence of the most
luminous cone is 5° 16′ for the small reflectors, and 4° 25′ for the
larger size. In arranging reflectors on the frame of a fixed light,
however, it is advisable to calculate upon a less amount of effective
divergence, for beyond 11° the light is very feeble; but the difficulty
of placing many mirrors on one frame, and the great expense of oil
required for so many lamps, have generally led to the adoption of the
first valuation of the _effective_ divergence.
~Power of Paraboloïdal Mirrors.~
The measure of the illuminating power of a paraboloïdal mirror may be
estimated as the _quotient of the_ SURFACE _of the circle which cuts it
in the plane of its greatest double ordinate, divided by the surface of
the largest vertical section of the flame, and diminished by the loss
of light in the process of reflection_. This estimate will be found
near enough for all practical purposes; but it is obviously inaccurate,
inasmuch as it overlooks the circumstance of the focal distance of each
portion of the mirror being different, and the consequent increase in
the length of the various trajectories at each point of the surface
as you recede from the axis; and the only correct rule, therefore,
is, to find an imaginary focal distance which must be the radius of a
spherical segment which shall answer the double condition of having
its surface equal to that of the greatest cross section of the mirror,
and of including, at the same time, a number of degrees equal to those
which are brought under the influence of the reflecting action of the
paraboloïd. This subject, however, as I have already hinted, is not
of great practical importance; and I shall not therefore dilate on it
farther, but content myself with saying, that such a line will be found
to be a _mean proportional_ between the _greatest_ and _least_ focal
distances of the mirror.[44] The large mirrors used in the Northern
Lights have about ¹²⁄₁₇ths of the whole light of the lamp incident on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account