Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
The effect produced by burning an equal quantity of oil, in revolving
lights on either system, may be estimated as follows:--In a revolving
light, like that of Skerryvore, having eight sides, each lighting with
its greatest power a horizontal sector of 4°, we have 32° (or _units_)
of the horizon illuminated with the full power of 3200 Argand flames,
and consequently an aggregate effect of 102,400 flames, produced by
burning the oil required for _sixteen_ reflectors; while in a catoptric
apparatus, like that of the old light at Inchkeith, having seven sides
of one reflector, each lighting with its greatest power a sector of
4°·25′, we have nearly 31° (or _units_) of the horizon illuminated with
the full power of 400 Argand flames, and consequently an aggregate
effect of 12,400 flames as the result of burning the oil required for
_seven_ reflectors. Hence, the _effect_ of burning the same quantity
of oil in revolving lights on either system, will be represented
respectively by (¹⁶⁄₇) 12,400 = 28,343 for the catoptric, contrasted
with 102,400 for the dioptric light; or, in other words, revolving
lights on the dioptric principle use the oil more _economically_ than
those on the catoptric plan, nearly in the ratio of 3·6 to 1.
~Comparison of Catoptric and Dioptric Apparatus for Fixed Lights.~
I shall now speak of fixed lights, to which the dioptric method is
peculiarly well adapted. The effect produced by the consumption of a
gallon of oil in a fixed light, with twenty-six reflectors, which is
the smallest number that can be properly employed, may be estimated as
follows:--The _mean_ effect of the light spread over the horizontal
sector, subtended by one reflector, as deduced from measurements made
at each horizontal degree, by the method of shadows, is equal to 174
unassisted Argand burners. If, then, this quantity be multiplied by 360
degrees, we shall obtain an aggregate effect of 62,640, which, divided
by 1040 (the number of gallons burned during a year in _twenty-six_
reflectors), would give 60 Argand flames for the effect of the light
maintained throughout the year by the combustion of a gallon of oil.
On the other hand, the power of a catadioptric light of the first
order, like that lately established at Girdleness, may be estimated
thus:--The _mean_ effect of the light produced by the joint effect of
both the dioptric and catadioptric parts of a fixed light apparatus,
may be valued at 450 Argand flames, which, multiplied by 360 degrees,
gives an aggregate of 162,000; and if this quantity be divided by 570
(the number of gallons burned by the great lamp in a year), we shall
have about 284 Argand flames for the effect of the light produced by
the combustion of a gallon of oil. It would thus appear that in fixed
lights, the French apparatus, as lately improved, produces, as the
_average_ effect of the combustion of the same quantity of oil over
the whole horizon, upwards of _four times_ the amount of light that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account