Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
is obtained by the catoptric mode; although, in certain directions,
opposite the axis of each reflector, the catoptric light be fully 50
_per centum_ more powerful than the dioptric light.
But the great superiority of the dioptric method chiefly rests upon
its _perfect_ fulfilment of an important condition required in a
fixed light, by distributing the rays _equally_ in every point of
the horizon. In the event of the whole horizon not requiring to be
illuminated, the dioptric light would lose a part of its superiority
in economy, and when half the horizon only is lighted, it would be
more expensive than the reflected light; but the greater power and
more equal distribution of the light, may be considered of so great
importance, as far to outweigh the difference of expense. In the
latter case, too, an additional power (as noticed p. 293) can be
given to the dioptric light, by placing at the landward side of the
lightroom, spherical mirrors with their centres in the focus of the
refracting apparatus.[76] The luminous cones, or pyramids of which
such reflectors would form the bases, instead of passing off uselessly
to the land, would thus be thrown back through the focal point, and
finally refracted, so as to increase the effect of the light seaward,
by nearly _one-third_ of the light which would otherwise be lost.
[76] A similar arrangement can also be made in revolving lights by
making the radius of the mirrors somewhat less than that of the
inscribed circle of the octagon bounded by the lenses, so that they
may circulate freely round the backs of the mirrors. The shortness of
the radius of the reflecting surface would, of course, increase the
divergence of the beam of light refracted through the lenses, as the
flame would, in this case, subtend a greater angle at the face of the
mirrors.
The expense of establishing a fixed light composed of twenty-six
reflectors, may be estimated at L.950, and its annual maintenance,
including interest on the first cost of the apparatus, may be reckoned
at L.425, 10s.: and the expense of fitting up a fixed light on the
dioptric principle with catadioptric zones is L.1511, while its annual
maintenance may be taken at L.285, 6s. 4d. It thus appears that the
annual expenditure of the dioptric fixed light is L.140, 3s. 8d. less
than that of a fixed light composed of twenty-six reflectors; while the
_average_ effect, equally diffused over the horizon, is _four times_
greater.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account