CHAPTER III.
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
Statistical Study
The statistical study compared two groups of cases in respect to I.Q.
These groups were selected from one large group, on the basis of
presence or absence of tonsillar defect. The tonsil group was composed
of 236 cases, and the normal group, of 294. The distribution of the two
groups according to intelligence is set forth in Table I, and in Figs. I
and II.
TABLE I
Tonsil Group Normal Group
I.Q. No. of Per cent of No. of Per cent of
Cases Cases Cases Cases
40- 50 2 .8 0 0
50- 60 1 .4 2 .7
60- 70 7 2.9 4 1.4
70- 80 21 8.9 29 9.8
80- 90 45 19.0 52 17.7
90-100 80 33.9 107 36.4
100-110 55 23.3 67 22.8
110-120 17 7.2 24 8.1
120-130 6 2.5 9 3.0
130-140 2 .8 0 0
140-150 1 .4 0 0
Average 94.9 95.4
Median 95.3 95.6
Q 8.705 8.27
[Sigma] 14.4 12.2
From these it is evident that the two groups are practically equal in
intelligence. The average I.Q. for the normal group is 95.4, as compared
with 94.9 for the tonsil group. The medians are equally close,--95.6 in
the normal group and 95.3 with the tonsil cases. The difference in
variability is negligible, Q being 8.705 and [Sigma] 14.4 in the
tonsil group, while in the normal Q is 8.27 and [Sigma] 12.2. The
two cases with the lowest I.Q.'s were tonsil cases, but the three
highest I.Q.'s also belong in this group.
Fig. 1. Distribution of I.Q.'s. Number of cases.
Fig. 2. Distribution of I.Q.'s by percentage of total number of
cases in the group.
If the frequencies are expressed in terms of per cent of the total
number of cases in the group, the two may be compared further. The
following details are noticeable.
I.Q. Per cent of Per Cent of
Tonsil Group Normal Group
Below 70 4.1 2.1
Below 90 32.0 29.6
Above 110 10.9 11.1
Above 120 3.7 3.0
Above 130 1.2 0
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account