The iron ball weighing eight ounces, multiplied
by the assumed speed of 50 feet per second, equals
400 units of work. The cotton ball, weighing 1/2
ounce, with the same initial speed, represents 25
units of work. The term "unit of work" means
a measurement, or a factor which may be used to
measure force.
It will thus be seen that it was not the thrower
which gave the power, but the article itself. A
feather ball thrown under the same conditions,
would produce a half unit of work, and the iron
ball, therefore, produced 800 times more energy.
RESISTANCE.--Now, in the movement of any body
through space, it meets with an enemy at every
step, and that is air resistance. This is much
more effective against the cotton than the iron
ball: or, it might be expressed in another way:
The momentum, or the power, residing in the
metal ball, is so much greater than that within the
cotton ball that it travels farther, or strikes a
more effective blow on impact with the wall.
HOW RESISTANCE AFFECTS THE SHAPE.--It is because
of this counterforce, resistance, that shape
becomes important in a flying object. The metal
ball may be flattened out into a thin disk, and now,
when the same force is applied, to project it forwardly,
it will go as much farther as the difference
in the air impact against the two forms.
MASS AND RESISTANCE.--Owing to the fact that
resistance acts with such a retarding force on an
object of small mass, and it is difficult to set up a
rapid motion in an object of great density, lightness
in flying machine structures has been considered,
in the past, the principal thing necessary.
THE EARLY TENDENCY TO ELIMINATE MOMENTUM.--
Builders of flying machines, for several
years, sought to eliminate the very thing
which gives energy to a horizontally-movable
body, namely, momentum.
Instead of momentum, something had to be
substituted. This was found in so arranging the
machine that its weight, or a portion of it, would
be sustained in space by the very element which
seeks to retard its flight, namely, the atmosphere.
If there should be no material substance, like
air, then the only way in which a heavier-than-air
machine could ever fly, would be by propelling it
through space, like the ball was thrown, or by
some sort of impulse or reaction mechanism on
the air-ship itself. It could get no support from
the atmosphere.
LIGHT MACHINES UNSTABLE.--Gradually the
question of weight is solving itself. Aviators are
beginning to realize that momentum is a wonderful
property, and a most important element in
flying. The safest machines are those which have
weight. The light, willowy machines are subject
to every caprice of the wind. They are notoriously
unstable in flight, and are dangerous even
in the hands of experts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account