Africa and the American FlagFoote, Andrew H. (Andrew Hull)
History
Africa and the American Flag
Foote, Andrew H. (Andrew Hull)
Africa, West -- Description and travel; Liberia -- History -- 1847-1944; Slave trade -- Africa, West
The vegetation of the south is brilliant, but not greatly useful. It
affords the type of that which covers the mountains, receding towards
the northeast, until they reach perpetual snow near the equator. That
which is of a more tropical character, stretches round their bases
and through their valleys, with its profusion of palms, creepers, and
dye-woods. These hereafter will form the commercial wealth of the
country, affording oil, india-rubber, dye-stuffs, and other useful
productions.
The wild animals of Africa belong to plains and to loose thickets,
rather than to timbered forests. There is a gradation in the height
of the head, among the larger quadrupeds, which indicates the sort of
country and of vegetation suitable to them.
The musket, with its “villanous saltpetre,” in the hands of barbarians
is everywhere expelling from the earth its bulkier creatures, so that
the elephant is disappearing, and ivory will become scarce. Fear tames
the wildest nature; even the lion is timid when he has to face the
musket. The dull ox has learned a lesson with regard to him; for when
the kingly brute prowls round an unyoked wagon resting at night, and
his growl or smell makes the oxen shake and struggle with terror, they
are quieted by the discharge of firearms.
When Europeans first visited the shores of Africa, they were astonished
at the tameness and abundance of unchecked animal life. The shallow
bays and river lagoons were full of gigantic creatures; seals were
found in great numbers, but of all animals these seem the most readily
extirpated. The multitudes which covered the reefs of South Africa are
nearly gone, and they seem to be no longer met with on the northern
shores of the continent. The manatee, or sea-cow, and the hippopotamus,
frequented the mouths of rivers, and were killed and eaten by the
natives. They had never tamed and used the elephant: that this might
have been done is inferred from the use of these animals by the
Carthaginians. But as the Carthaginian territory was not African in
the strict sense of the term, it may be doubted whether their species
was that of Central Africa. This latter species is a larger, less
intelligent looking, and probably a more stubborn creature than the
Asiatic. The roundness of their foreheads and the size of their ears
give them a duller and more brutal look; the magnitude of their tusks,
and the occurrence of these formidable weapons in the female as well
as in the male, are accommodated to the necessity of conflict with the
lion, and indicate a wilder nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account