After the War: A Southern Tour. May 1, 1865 to May 1, 1866Reid, Whitelaw
History
After the War: A Southern Tour. May 1, 1865 to May 1, 1866
Reid, Whitelaw
Plantation life; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); Southern States -- Description and travel
All had the idea that in January the lands of their former masters were
to be divided among them; and it was, therefore, almost impossible to
make contracts with them for labor on the farms through the ensuing
year. The inhabitants charged that this idea had been sedulously spread
among them by the Yankee soldiers, and that they had been advised never
to contract for more than a month’s work at a time, until the division
of property came. Here is a specimen of the way in which the Lynchburg
papers treated the difficulty:
“The refusal of these people to make contracts for labor another
year completely deranges all the regular and matured plans of our
farmers. They know not what provision to make for feeding their
employees; what extent of soil to mark out for seed; what kind of
crops to cultivate, or what calculations to make upon their
operations. If they sow, they are not certain to what extent they
can reap; and if they attempt a variety of crops, (including
tobacco,) they have no assurance whatever that their labor will not
forsake them at the very moment that it is most indispensable.
“A friend in Amherst suggests that the powers that be should issue
an order to the effect that all who do not get homes, or show they
have a support within themselves, by the 1st day of January, 1866,
will, on the 10th of said month, (nine days’ notice being given,) be
hired out to the highest bidder. Such an order would, in his
opinion, cause all except the most worthless to secure homes before
the 20th of December. These suggestions certainly seem to us to have
wisdom in them, and to meet the difficulties, to some extent, that
now so seriously embarrass and retard agricultural pursuits; and we
respectfully commend them to the attention of the proper
authorities. One thing is certain, that if the negroes are not made
to enter into contracts, and to keep them when made, the most
ruinous consequences will result to our farming interests, and
provisions enough will not be made to feed our people another year.
Some fanatics and deluded persons, we know, will laugh at this idea,
and tell us that the South has never been so prosperous in the past
as she will be in the future under our present system of labor. But
taking the most favorable view of the subject, it is still manifest
to every one at all familiar with the real condition of things, that
freed negro labor never was and never can be made _productive_—that
is to say, _accumulative_ or _progressive_; and that any reliance
upon the _voluntary_ work of free negroes, beyond what is absolutely
necessary to their sustenance, is both vain and foolish. And we
predict now, with regret and pain, what the results will certainly
show, that there will henceforth be a steady and permanent decline
in all the productions of the South dependent upon negro labor, as
there has been in the French and British emancipation islands; and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account