Aids to the Study of the Maya Codices: Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1884-85, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1888, pages 253-372Thomas, Cyrus
History
Aids to the Study of the Maya Codices: Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1884-85, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1888, pages 253-372
Thomas, Cyrus
Codex Dresdensis Maya; Maya language
The symbol appears to be used also in the ordinary sense, or at least to
signify other vessels than the sacred four, if we may judge by its
frequent repetition in Plate XIV, Manuscript Troano. But it is worthy of
notice that here also, in both the middle and lower divisions, four of
the symbols are connected with the cardinal point symbols; there is also
in the former the figure of a vessel.
[Illustration: Hieroglyph]
If this identification be correct it is important, as it has a strong
bearing on the question of phoneticism. It will be observed that,
although the right hand member resembles closely the symbol of the day
Ymix, there are some differences, as may be seen by comparison. In the
former the little figure at the top is divided as in Kan, and on each
side of it there is a large dot, usually, and apparently by intention,
circular or hollow. These differences are permanent in the different
codices.
In the upper division of Plates X and XI, Manuscript Troano, where this
symbol appears in connection with each of the four cardinal symbols, that
relating to the east presents this remarkable variation:
[Illustration: Hieroglyph]
[Illustration: No. 15 _a_ _b_]
(?) A conventional figure of sprouting maize, never inserted in the
text, but frequently in the Manuscript Troano and in the Peresian
Codex made a part of the head gear of figures of deities, in which
case the Kan symbol is generally omitted.
The Kan symbol in this connection cannot be intended, as Dr. Schellhas
supposes, to indicate the field or milpa in which the corn is growing,
but the grain from which the plant is springing. (On this subject see
Study of the Manuscript Troano, by Cyrus Thomas, pp. 105 and 107.)
[Illustration: No. 16]
(?) Symbol of a worm which gnawed the roots of the growing agave or
maguey; appears but once, on Plate XXIX_c_ of the Manuscript Troano.
The animal head and teeth show the erroneous idea the natives had of the
gnawing apparatus of insects. The worm is shown on the next page in Fig.
375.
[Illustration: FIG. 375. Worm and plant from Manuscript Troano.]
[Illustration: FIG. 376. Figure of a woman from the Dresden Codex.]
[Illustration: No. 17]
_Chuplal._ Woman or female. This symbol is found in the Dresden and
Troano Codices, but most frequently in the former. The appendage at
the right is sometimes wanting, and occasionally that at the left,
but when this is the case some other prefix is generally
substituted.
If we examine carefully Plates 16-20 of the Dresden Codex, where this
symbol is most frequently repeated, and compare it with the heads of the
females there figured, it soon becomes apparent that the scrolls with the
heavy black dot are intended to denote the locks of hair and that the
symbol as a whole is, as usual, a modified or conventional form of the
head (see Fig. 376).
[Illustration: No. 18 _a_ _b_ _c_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account