If we except the effort of Dupuy de Lôme, the next remarkable attempt
at airship construction was in 1852, when the Parisian Giffard made his
steam-driven elongated balloon, with which he made two experiments.
These merely proved that successful navigation against a wind would
require much larger motive power than his Lilliputian steam-engine of 3
h.p. Giffard, however, was the pioneer of the airship driven by other
than hand power. The following are the dimensions, etc., of what will
ever be an historic balloon:--
Length 44 metres
Diameter 12.00 metres
Cubic capacity 2,500 cubic metres
Horse power 3.0
Estimated speed per hour 6.71 miles
The experiments of Krebs and Renard in 1885 were noteworthy. They were
the first in which direct return journeys were made to the place whence
the balloon started.
These experiments showed the importance of the military factor in the
development of aërial navigation. Krebs and Renard were the officers
in charge of the French Military Aëronautical Department at Meudon,
and they applied national funds to the construction of an airship. It
was the development of the electrical industry and the production
of electric motors at that time which stimulated the experiments.
The brothers Tissandier had, in 1883, propelled an elongated balloon
against a wind of some three metres a second by means of an electric
bichromate battery which supplied the power to an electric motor. It
was thought that those experiments had been sufficiently successful for
further trial of the powers of electricity.
Renard made profound and exhaustive researches into the science of the
navigable balloon. To him we are, indeed, indebted for the elucidation
of the underlying principles that have made military airships possible.
The navigable balloon “La France” was dissymmetrical, being made very
much in the shape of a fish or bird. Its master diameter was near the
front, and the diameters diminished gradually to a point at the back.
The following were the dimensions of the envelope:--
Length 50.40 metres
Diameter 8.40 metres
Length in diameters 6.00 metres
The airship was remarkably steady on account of the minute precautions
taken to counteract the instability produced by a somewhat excessive
length. Any device which modifies pitching at the same time lessens
the loss of speed resulting from the resistance of the air when the
ship is moving at an angle. A direct means of reducing pitching is
the dissymmetrical form given to the envelope by placing the master
diameter near the front. The resistance of the air falls on the front
surface, which in this dissymmetric form of envelope is much shortened,
while the compensating surface at the back is augmented. Many experts
are of opinion that in this form of envelope Krebs and Renard came
nearer perfection than any other navigable balloon constructor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account