Albyn; or, Scotland and the futureMacDiarmid, Hugh
History
Albyn; or, Scotland and the future
MacDiarmid, Hugh
Scotland
All these movements then represent so many antitheses of the
tendencies which have dominated Scotland since the Union and have
conjointly driven it so far along the road to Anglicization.
They are asserting themselves and have arrested the tendency to
assimilate Scotland to English standards just when it seemed on the
point of complete success. Lost ground is being rapidly recovered;
efforts are being made once more to create distinctively Scottish
literature comparable in artistic quality and tendencious force to
the contemporary output of other European countries, and to regain
the independent cultural position of Scotland in Europe; efforts
are being made to create a Scottish national drama and Scottish
national music—both of which Scotland alone of European countries
entirely lacks, mainly because of Calvinistic repression—and all
these efforts are achieving a measure of success. Scottish genius is
being liberated from its Genevan prison-house. But the centralization
of British arts and affairs in London is still restricting it in
ways that can only be redressed by that re-orientation of facilities
which would follow the re-establishment of an independent Scottish
Parliament, or, in the event of a return to the system of Provinces,
a federation of assemblies. The movement cannot manifest its full
stature and move freely, save within that framework of a Scotland
become once again a nation in every sense of the term for which it
has been designed.
II
In the foregoing chapter I have given an account of the movement
upon which it seems to me the future of Scotland depends—or,
rather, a Scottish future of Scotland. Scotland, of course, may
have another future. It may become a Roman-Catholic country with a
predominantly Irish population. Or its progressive anglicization and
provincialization may continue until it becomes to all intents and
purposes a part of its English neighbour. The latter is still the
likeliest; the former has only within the past few years emerged as a
serious competitor. But the main point to seize upon in the meantime
is that, apart from the “Scottish Renaissance Group,” the rest of
the Scottish people in Scotland to-day are not Scottish in any real
sense of the term. They have no consciousness of difference except
in detail; “distinctions without difference.” They are all the less
Scottish in proportion to their ardour as Burns enthusiasts, members
of St Andrew’s and Caledonian Societies and the like. Just as the
majority of Socialists become conscious of the economic causes of
their plight but retain (often in an exacerbated form) the types
of ideas on other matters which spring from the same source, so
the vast majority of Scots to-day—even Scottish Home Rulers—regard
as typically Scottish the very sentiments and attitudes which
are the products of their progressive anglicization. Scotland is
suffering from a very widespread inferiority complex—the result
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account