Alcoholic Fermentation: Second Edition, 1914Harden, Arthur
Science
Alcoholic Fermentation: Second Edition, 1914
Harden, Arthur
Fermentation
Thenard's memoir was followed by a communication of fundamental
importance from Gay-Lussac [1810]. A process for preserving food had
been introduced by Appert, which consisted in placing the material
in bottles, closing these very carefully and exposing them to the
temperature of boiling water for some time. Gay-Lussac was struck
by the fact that when such a bottle was opened fermentation or
putrefaction set in rapidly. Analysis of the air left in such a sealed
bottle showed that all the oxygen had been absorbed, and these facts
led to the view that fermentation was set up by the action of oxygen
on the fermentable material. Experiment appeared to confirm this in
the most striking way. A bottle of preserved grape-juice was opened
over mercury and part of its contents passed through the mercury into
a bell-jar containing air, the remainder into a similar vessel free
from air. In the presence of air fermentation set in at once, in the
absence of air no fermentation whatever occurred. This connection
between fermentation and the presence of air was established by
numerous experiments and appeared incontestable. Fermentation, it
was found, could be checked by boiling even after the addition of
oxygen, and hence food could be preserved in free contact with the
air, provided only that it was raised to the temperature of boiling
water at short intervals of time. Gay-Lussac's opinion was that
the ferment was formed by the action of the oxygen on the [p005]
liquid, and that the product of this action was altered by heat and
rendered incapable of producing fermentation, as was also brewer's
yeast, which, however, he regarded, on account of its insolubility, as
different from the soluble ferment which initiated the change in the
limpid grape-juice. Colin, on the other hand [1825], recognised that
alcoholic fermentation by whatever substance it was started, resulted
in the formation of an insoluble deposit more active than the original
substance, and he suggested that this deposit might possibly in every
case be of the same nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account