Diplomats -- United States -- Biography; Morgenthau, Henry, 1856-1946; United States -- Foreign relations -- 20th century
In the composition of that reply, Hoover’s opinions as to details again
diverged from mine. He continued in his antagonism to an American
Regular Army officer on the active list, as an administrator of Caucasus
relief-work and evinced firm opposition to America taking a mandate. He
argued good-temperedly, but strongly, to win me to his point of view; I
was not convinced, and we at last reached another compromise, settling
on such statements as we could both subscribe to. The reply was dated
July 2nd, and was in part:
Active relief work on a large scale is now in progress in the most
distressed areas of Armenia, but will require much enlarged
support, in view of the expiration of Congressional
appropriations.... Competent observers report that immediate
training and equipment of adequate Armenian forces would be
impracticable and that the repatriation of refugees is feasible
only under protection of British or American troops. British
authorities inform us that they cannot spare troops for this
purpose.... All military advisers agree that the Armenian
population itself, even if furnished arms and supplies, will be
unable to overcome Turkish opposition and surrounding pressure....
To secure ... establishment and protection and undertake the
economic development of the state, such mandatory must, until it
becomes self-supporting, provide not less than $300,000,000. It
would have to be looked upon as a sheer effort to ease humanity.
At about this point, Hoover’s opposition to America assuming a mandate
manifests itself in the message. We agreed that he should add a few
lines, expressly and explicitly on his own responsibility. So the
message, after the joint signature of “Hoover-Morgenthau,” continued:
Mr. Hoover wishes to add on his sole responsibility that he
considers that the only practicable method by which a government in
this region could be made economically self-supporting would be to
embrace in the same mandatory the area of Mesopotamia where there
are very large possibilities of economic development, where there
would be an outlet for the commercial abilities of the Armenians,
and with such an enlarged area it could be hoped in a few years to
build up a State self-supporting, although the intervention of some
dominant foreign race must be continued until the entire population
could be educated to a different basis of moral relations, and that
consequently whatever State is assigned the mandatory for
Mesopotamia should at the same time take up the burden of Armenia.
When that portion of the message was suggested, I said to Mr. Hoover:
“The inclusion of Mesopotamia in the proposition would absolutely
destroy all chances of America taking the mandate.”
“Well,” said Hoover, “I wouldn’t object if that was the effect of it.”
The “effect” has now long since passed into history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account