Neutrality -- Belgium; Peace; United States -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
The chancellor [spoke] about twenty minutes. He said the step
taken by Great Britain was terrible to a degree. Just for a
word, “neutrality,” a word which in war time had been so often
disregarded, just for a scrap of paper, Great Britain was
going to make war on a kindred nation. What we had done was
unthinkable. It was like striking a man from behind while he was
fighting for his life against two assailants.
I protested strongly against this statement, and said that in
the same way as he wished me to understand that for strategical
reasons it was a matter of life or death to Germany to advance
through Belgium and violate the latter’s neutrality, so I would
wish him to understand that it was, so to speak, a matter of life
or death for the honor of Great Britain that she should keep her
solemn engagement to do her utmost to defend Belgium’s neutrality
if attacked. A solemn compact simply had to be kept, or what
confidence could any one have in England’s engagement in the
future?
There is one nation, however, as to which there is no room for
difference of opinion, whether we consider her wrongs or the justice
of her actions. It seems to me impossible that any man can fail to
feel the deepest sympathy with a nation which is absolutely guiltless
of any wrong-doing, which has given proof of high valor, and yet which
has suffered terribly, and which, if there is any meaning in the words
“right” and “wrong,” has suffered wrongfully. Belgium is not in the
smallest degree responsible for any of the conditions that during the
last half century have been at work to impress a certain fatalistic
stamp upon those actions of Austria, Russia, Germany, and France which
have rendered this war inevitable. No European nation has had anything
whatever to fear from Belgium. There was not the smallest danger of
her making any aggressive movement, not even the slightest aggressive
movement, against any one of her neighbors. Her population was mainly
industrial and was absorbed in peaceful business. Her people were
thrifty, hard-working, highly civilized, and in no way aggressive.
She owed her national existence to the desire to create an absolutely
neutral state. Her neutrality had been solemnly guaranteed by the great
powers, including Germany as well as England and France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account