To those, on the other hand, who may incline to a measure of equal
harmony between that laid down in the proposition and that of
Dr. Smith, on account of the rapidity of the beats of the more
complex consonances, it maybe sufficient to reply, that if the
beats of a more complex consonance are more rapid than those of a
simpler one, when both are equally tempered, those of the latter,
cæteris paribus, are more _distinct_. It is the distinctness of the
undulations, in tempered consonances, which is one of the principal
causes of offence to the ear.
_Scholium 2._
It will be proper to explain, in this place, the notation of
musical intervals, which will be adopted in the following pages.
It is well known that musical intervals are as the logarithms
of their corresponding ratios. If, therefore, the octave be
represented by .30103, the log. of 2, the value of the Vth will be
expressed by .17509; that of the major tone by .05115; that of the
comma by .00540, &c. But in order to avoid the prefixed ciphers,
in calculations where so small intervals as the temperaments of
different concords are concerned, we will multiply each of these
values by 100,000, which will give a set of integral values having
the same ratio. The octave will now become 30103, the comma 540,
&c.; and, in general, when temperaments are hereafter expressed by
numbers, they are to be considered as so many 540ths of a comma.
Had more logarithmic places been taken, the intervals would have
been expressed with greater accuracy; but it was supposed that the
additional accuracy would not compensate for the increased labour
of computation which it would occasion. This notation has been
adopted by Dr. Robinson, in the article Temperament, (Encyc. Brit.
Supplement;) and for every practical purpose, is as much superior
to that proposed by Mr. Farey, in parts of the Schisma, lesser
fraction and minute,[5] as all decimal measures necessarily are, to
those which consist of different denominations.
PROPOSITION II.
In adjusting the imperfections of the scale, so as to render
all the consonances as equally harmonious as possible, only the
simple consonances, such as the Vth, IIId, and 3d, with their
complements to and compounds with the octave, can be regarded.
It has been generally assigned as the reason for neglecting the
consonances, usually termed discords, in ascertaining the best
scheme of temperament, that they are of less frequent occurrence
than the concords. This, however, if it were the only reason, would
lead us, not to neglect them entirely, but merely to give them a
less degree of influence than the concords, in proportion as they
are less used.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account