Another objection may be, that though high degrees of heat affect
certain solids as above stated, yet these cannot be sensibly acted
on by such feeble agents as atmospheric air and the rays of the
sun. I answer, if it be admitted that sensible heat acts on solids
in an increasing ratio to its intensity, it follows that lower
degrees, though acting in an inverse ratio to higher, must affect
the same bodies in a conceivable degree at any temperature above
their natural zero:[40] and though the heat of the sun beating on
a plane surface for several hours is feeble, compared with that
produced by a burning lens, or air furnace, yet if it be sufficient
to detach from one square foot of the earth's surface the 104023
part of a grain in twenty-four hours, the quantity taken from 100
square miles, in the same time and proportion, would amount to ten
pounds, which is abundantly sufficient for all meteoric phenomena;
and the loss to each square foot, supposing the process to be
uninterrupted, would be no more than one grain in 284 years. When
we advert to the intense heat produced by concentrating a few of
the sun's rays in a burning lens, the whole quantity daily sent
to the earth must strike us forcibly. If collected in a lens of
sufficient magnitude, they might volatilize a space equal to the
state of New-York in a moment of time! As all bodies possess a
limited capacity for heat, does it not follow that there must be
some outlet to its perpetual accession to our globe, or the earth
would soon become so highly ignited as to glow with the fulgour of
a meteor? And may not this outlet be found in the above described
compounds? which serve as conductors of the surplus of heat from
the earth to the higher regions of the air, where on being freed
by displosion, from the grosser matters incumbering it, it finds
a rapid passage to its great archetype and parent, the SUN. Thus
his daily waste may be restored, and an equilibrium, by the return
of his own emanated particles, preserved, between the sun and the
earth, and probably all the planets of our system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account