American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
Chase’s winters had been spent in New York and he kept moving in both
his habitations and his occupations. He left the Fifth Avenue studio
for a large rambling place on Fourth Avenue, where rooms opened into
rooms, and where he continued painting people and fish. He again
took up teaching at the Art Students League, sent pictures to the
International Exhibition at Berlin, held an exhibition of his own
at Cincinnati, went to California where he had a summer school at
Carmel-by-the-Sea, served as a member of the Panama-Pacific Exposition
jury. His energy and his interest were unflagging. He painted and
taught and talked, he came and went and came again, as no other painter
in American art-history. His industry alone would command respect. Even
when he fell into his final illness and was taken to Atlantic City for
change of air he had canvases and brushes packed and sent with him. He
might be able to paint down there. At the last, when too weak to read,
it pleased him to go over, with his wife, all the beautiful pictures
they had seen together and compare their likings. His enthusiasm was
always something to be remembered; and when in October, 1916, he
died, there was a pronounced feeling in art circles that not only a
torch-bearer, but a devoted lover of art had gone on.
There was nothing complicated or hidden or mysterious about either
Chase or his art. He frankly stated his aim, faith, and practice
more than once and adhered to his beliefs for more than forty years.
He cared nothing about theories or philosophies or ideals and was
not led off by realism, impressionism, or cubism. He talked much on
art, not only to his classes but to miscellaneous audiences; but he
indulged in no metaphysical flights and spoke a language that all could
understand. As a practical painter his primary concern was with the
ability to paint. The picture should be technically and mechanically
a good piece of workmanship. The grammar of art first, and what you
may have to say with it afterward. At times he intimated that things,
by no means technical, could be said with the paint-brush, as, for
example, this utterance: “The value of a work of art depends simply
and solely on the height of inspiration, on the greatness of soul,
of the man who produced it.” But, generally speaking, Chase cared
not too much for “soul” in art and produced little of it in his own
pictures. His creed of painting was better stated in another sentence.
“The essential phases of a great picture are three in number, namely:
truth, interesting treatment, and quality.” By truth he meant that the
picture should give the impression of a thing well seen. By interesting
treatment he meant verve, spirit, enthusiasm, the interest of the
artist--an interest which should express itself in his manner of
treatment. Regarding this he continued:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account