American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
Occasionally, too, while at Shinnecock, Chase painted views of the
sea, unadorned or unalloyed by beach or shore or people, that were
very effective in wave movement and color. He had a finer feeling for
color and texture than Winslow Homer but he never had Homer’s grasp of
power. In his studio at Shinnecock he painted portraits, genre, and
still-life--some of the last being fish. Here, in still-life, with
his cunning handling and with color and texture as the chief motive,
he appeared to great advantage. By many people his fish-painting
is regarded as his highest achievement. In no less than half a
dozen museums in the United States he is represented by still-life
pictures in which the bulk, the weight, the limpness of dead fish are
convincingly shown, but where perhaps greater emphasis is thrown on the
slippery wet surfaces with their iridescent colorings. A few years
before he died, in showing a new fish-picture in his studio he remarked
to me with some deprecation in his manner that he supposed after he was
gone he would be known as a fish-painter! He had made the same protest
to others.
[Illustration: “Afternoon at Peconic,” by William Merritt Chase.]
A short trip to London was taken in 1902. His pupils had asked him
to sit to Sargent for his portrait and he did so. The portrait was
afterward given to the Metropolitan Museum, where it now hangs. Chase
greatly admired Sargent’s sureness and facility and often referred his
students to Sargent’s portraits for their study. He was always generous
in recognition of good work, even where perhaps he did not like the
worker’s point of view, as with Boldini, for example. Sargent and
Boldini could outfoot him on his own ground, but that did not matter.
He could still cheer for them.
It was during 1902 that Chase conceived the remarkable idea of not
only going to Europe himself for the summer months but taking with
him his entire class of students. The first contingent went with him
to Holland, and at Haarlem one night at dinner he gave me an account
of the venture and its success. His pupils had not only profited
by foreign scene and museum but he had taken them to see certain
well-known painters in their studios and shown them the modern methods
of painting. The next year he took the class to England, located it on
Hampstead Heath, and introduced it at the studios of Sargent, Abbey,
Lavery, Alma-Tadema, Shannon. The year of 1905 the class was in Madrid
and after that for a number of years in Florence. Chase bought a villa
in Florence, but apparently it was little more than a storehouse for
objects of art which he was still collecting. He spent much time at
Venice, and both there and at Florence would take his pupils to the
great galleries and point out to them what was excellent in the old
masters. It was a new method of art teaching and satisfactory results
came from it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account