American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent — John Shaqi
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
The art of old Japan ran on for centuries and was excellent art
notwithstanding it was academic and based in tradition. It did not run
into formalism and never became trite until recent years. Its ruin lies
straight ahead of it if it shall abandon its traditions and continue to
coquette with Occidental art. But the bulk of painting by the young men
of the Society of American Artists became commonplace within a dozen
years after their return because they had learned abroad only a manner
and reproduced it here in America with the persistence of a mannerism.
They never knew the academic in its larger significance; they never
felt the spirit and style of the traditional.
That is not to proclaim their work worthless or their movement
inconsequent. On the contrary, almost everything that one generation
in art could do was done. And well done. They established a foundation
in sound technique. It remains to be seen if those who come after
will build upon it or cast it down. Moreover, as an expression of
the individual quite apart from the time, place, or people, as a
representation of cosmopolitan belief about art, it must be accorded a
very high place. Whistler and Sargent happen just now to be the most
talked about exponents of the cosmopolitan, but dozens of painters
here in America since 1876 belong in the same class and have the
same belief. It is all along of a new departure in art, and how it
shall work out no one can say, but that it does not entirely satisfy
contemporary needs is already manifest. In spite of present practice,
and quite apart from _Ten O’Clock_ and other painter extravagances, art
is still believed to be in some way an expression of a time, a place,
and a people. The world has not yet grown so small that it does not
continue to exhibit race characteristics in its art manifestations.
That the all-the-world-as-one idea may be farther-reaching, more
universal in its scope, and therefore loftier in its art expression
than any national or race expression is very possible; nay, probable.
Still, even then, with cosmopolitanism in the saddle, there will be the
need and the use of tradition--the consensus of opinion and body of
belief as to what constitutes style in art.
II
GEORGE INNESS
1825-1894
II
GEORGE INNESS
1825-1894
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account